Posted on 04/15/2011 6:58:44 AM PDT by Smokeyblue
If you watch and listen carefully to the 20-minute, 14 April 2011 interview of Barack Hussein Obama by George Stephanopoulos, you will notice something very telling that takes place during that interview when the discussion shifts to the issue of Donald Trump and ultimately, the birther conspiracy. Veteran investigators who are experienced in interviewing and interrogating suspects, witnesses, criminals and non-criminals have undoubtedly identified numerous big red flags of deception precisely when expected, and in textbook fashion. To observe this in action, begin watching the video at about the 13:25 minute mark, when Stephanopoulos lobs the following softball, leading question to Obama and receives his answer:
George Stephanopoulos: I wonder how you size up your potential opponents? I mean all of us have been struck by Donald Trump rising to the top of the Republican field by feeding fantasies about your background. What do you make of that?
First, note that Stephanopoulos sets an amicable tone for easy rebuttal by Obama to anyone believing that anything might be amiss with regard to Obamas eligibility. He asks a leading question that automatically suggests that any reference to the birther issue as raised by Donald Trump is fantasy. Accordingly, Obama should be able to handle the question without any obvious stress or difficulty. But heres exactly where the difficult-to-control verbal and non-verbal clues of deception take over. First, read his response:
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
“Stephie” tosses up cream puffs for 0bama and even covers (”my muslim faith”) when he has to, so if “the one” should’ve been totally comfortable.
That's not exactly the point either. We want to know if he qualifies to be president as a natural born citizen.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Look you don’t have to present all your qualifications.
The person known as Obama is lying. Otherwise the BC wouldn’t be an issue. No one asked if he had horns. No one asked if he was a devil worshiper. He was asked about proof of his birth. He won’t show it. Period.
Person known as Obama: where are your papers?
btt
Personally, I think its fairly obvious that Obama lies. He lies ALL THE TIME. Its hard to find one speech he’s ever given that he has not lied.
Ergo, whatever he claims you can bet your sweet bippy the truth is 180 degrees the opposite direction. So....if he ‘claims’ to have been born in Hawaii statistics dictate he WASN’T.
That’s the problem with liars: You can’t trust anything they ‘say’.
Wake up America.
I have read that not only will he not show the long-form birth certificate, but he has paid big money to keep it locked up so it can’t be seen.
If true, this is what is very troubling. If true, I wish I would hear this more when the issue is discussed. Why would someone spend money to KEEP his birth certificate from being seen. This is what casts a dark shadow on this whole issue.
Trump must be giving this odious man sleepless nights.
Hussein is a liar. Who woulda thunk it?
Oh, but no worries: I am certain the networks will hold his feet to the fire over the issue.
BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!
The point is that even in an incredibly soft ball interview with an interviewer known for being easy on him...Obama showed signs of stress as he lied.
The very fact that Trump is getting to Obama and eliciting high stress reactions can only mean that Obama is seriously vulnerable here. I can't imagine all that Obama might be hiding, but his extreme degree of stress apparent in this interview and just by his and his minions referring to Trump lately indicates something really significant buried here.
Excellent analysis! It's the first thing I noticed when I heard him answer the question.
it’s so blatantly in your face obvious that obama is a fraud, and yet our “leaders” won’t call him out on it
ping
“As the title of this article indicates, it is my professional analysis that the verbal and non-verbal indicators of deception are not only present in this interview, but are off the charts and offer a classic textbook example of the same. Obviously, Obama did not take this opportunity to clear up this matter when provided the opportunity, even in this non-hostile venue. Clearly then, we should expect nothing different should he ever be compelled to prove his constitutional eligibility in a not-so-friendly venue.”
Our deception detection skills need some sharpening.
http://joytiz.com/2009/emblems-of-audacity-obamas-emotional-leakage/
“The point is that even in an incredibly soft ball interview with an interviewer known for being easy on him...Obama showed signs of stress as he lied.”
Exactly.
I love your posts, but the dial-up FReepers must hate you!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.