On FR each day there are many eligibility threads. Every single one of the statements you made ‘proving’ Barry’s birth in HI has been debunked thousands, literally thousands, of times. There are people here on FR—I’ve pinged a few of them—who have the facts at their fingertips, and who post them repeatedly. Yet it’s all water off a duck’s back to you. You still buy the Obama-defenders/enablers’ lies, lock stock and barrel. If you seriously wanted the truth, you’d read the posts of some of the people I pinged. If you don’t want the truth, that still doesn’t justify posting straight Obama-cover-up lies over and over.
Obama has plenty of defenders right here on FR. Some would say he has too many. Why anyone would still be arguing we shouldn’t be allowed to see his original LF BC is beyond me. You will take the word of a pathological liar, but you’ll trash your fellow FReepers day in and day out. A strange, strange kind of conservative you are, I must say.
No they have not. Many birther Freepers have tried to (unsuccessfully) explain away the evidence. Usually they make up or uncritially repeat a factoid made up by some birther blog to try to argue against the vailidity of the evidence. More often than not, the factoid ends up being outright false.
There are people here on FR—I’ve pinged a few of them—who have the facts at their fingertips, and who post them repeatedly.
The problem is that what they have at their fingertips aren't facts, but false rumors that some other birther has literally made up.
You still buy the Obama-defenders/enablers’ lies, lock stock and barrel.
What lies, specifically? Are you saing it is a lie that Hawaii's health director explicitly confirmed his birth in Hawaii? Are you saying it is a lie that the Hawaii birth index has an entry for him in 1961? Are you saying that it is a lie that Hawaii newspapers published birth announcements based on information they received from the Hawaii Department of Health?
If you seriously wanted the truth, you’d read the posts of some of the people I pinged.
I've read the vast majority of birther posts on this forum, and I have found them wanting in terms of both logic and evidence.
Why anyone would still be arguing we shouldn’t be allowed to see his original LF BC is beyond me.
That's not what I am arguing.
You will take the word of a pathological liar,
I am not relying on his word. I am relying on multiple, independently verifiable pieces of evidence that do not depend on his honesty or lack thereof for their validity.