Here’s a solution - why not allow a known and trusted Conservative - Jim Robinson for example, to view the original birth certificate - promising not to disclose anything other than that it exists? I’m thinking that no one is really interested in what’s on it, just that it’s real - case closed.
This solution is probably way too simple, but it would work.
I’m also thinking that it’s not the existence of the certificate or not that has people so curious, it’s the millions that Obama is personally spending to hide it from public view. Now that is more than passingly strange and should prompt curiosity and investigation unless one is brain dead.
It’s good to try to come up with creative ways to get to the truth of the matter. However, your idea has at least one significant flaw: what does our trusted conservative do if he/she observes information that indicates that Obama is not eligible to be president, or other significant ‘bombshell’. How can you agree to such terms? How would Jim or whoever keep such information confidential? I don’t see anyone in the “obama” camp agreeing to your terms or to terms which would allow disclosure of evidence pertaining to eligibility.
At this point I am almost certain that they have a forged long-form in their office right now. The only thing that will mean anything at this point is complete analysis of the embedded transaction logs and complete vital records history for ALL the records we already know have problems or were tampered with: COLB, passport file, selective service registration, and SSN.
As Trump said, it is way too easy for records to be manipulated. That’s what we’re seeing with the newspaper birth announcements as well. Somebody at the Advertiser office perpetrated a huge hoax, as far as I can tell.