Actually, I give her mad props for this, BECAUSE, why bother will a few billions of cuts, which won't make a damn bit of difference -- as opposed to Ryan's TRILLIONS of cuts in 2012, which WILL make a difference?
To put it in a War on Terror analogy, we might let the little Taliban squad go, so they can lead us to Bin Laden's personal picked Mullah in Afghanistan. Let the little ones go, so the big ones get picked off.
That's what Michelle was saying, and I guess I agree.
I agree 100%. We have bigger fish to fry. As long as Dems hold the Senate, and the bozo is in the White House, we have to accept certain realities.
2012 is coming, and like someone said earlier, “That is the hill to stand, and possibly die on”.
The Dems have always used incrementalism.
Paul Ryan has loaded the weapons, and drawn out a battle plan, but we need more soldiers on the field to implement it.