.
Gretchen Carlson Miss USA....back in the day....
.
Apparently the liberals need time to come up with 8,000 “misplaced” ballots—all voting for Kloppenberg.
I think they’re worried about the liberals going nuts and burning buildings.
MSM still refusing to get the narrative right, I see...
that is not Gretchen Carlson?
Democrats NEVER lose an election.
It is either STOLEN (2000), the public is too STUPID to know better (2004) or the masses were BRAINWASHED by FoxNews/Talk Radio (2010).
This is a universal belief in La La Lefty land.
I am glad Repubs have a learning curve.
Dems have held the last ballot box and then turned in the number of votes they needed. It worked for Johnson in the 1960’s and elsewhere since then (Washington state, Wisconsin, etc.).
Repubs finally figured it out and kept a big collection of ballots themselves.
Turnabout if fair play.
Are they also going to probe the county that was caught shredding ballots?
So did these arsewipes make this statement when the RAT “won” by 204 votes, or only when the Constitutionalist won by 7,000?
At that point in time, she did not need to be able to count....
I am old, but she was pleasant on the eyes.
LMAO......this is the way to stop the fraud. The dems won’t know how many votes they need to find in order for their stooge to go over the top. They thought their math was just right.
SUCKERS
My wife’s hotter. And I can touch her.
Would they do this same probe of the counting process if the Dems had won?
They are freaking over at Kos with supposed experts saying that Access always saves, you don’t actually hit “save” so she’s lying. They miss that she was importing Excel spreadsheets into Access. It’s easy to screw that up and not have the data added to the database.
Of course the big question is why in this day and age is a manual process using Access and Excel being used to count votes?
Doug La Follette, Secretary of State of Wisconsin is a [DEMOCRAT]. This is the guy that will certify the results of the election. Any WI FReepers know anything about this guy?
Who cares what the loser has to say. Certify Justice Prosser now.
“misplaced and then found some 14,000 votes that upended the contest”
That is a lie, there weren’t any misplaced votes, there weren’t any found votes.
The votes weren’t reported, period.
Nope, not her.
MISS USA 2006, Tara Elizabeth Conner.That info is all embedded in the 'EXIF/IPTC' data.Caption: Miss Kentucky Tara Elizabeth Conner, 20, competes in the swimsuit contest of the Miss USA 2006 pageant Friday, April 21, 2006 in Baltimore. Conner won the pageant. The new titleholder will compete July 23 in the Miss Universe competition in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Chris Gardner)
(Every digital image has that 'EXIF' *stuff*. Including the Photographer, Camera make-model, lens settings and the Copyright holder, etc, ad infinitum. You find it with an 'EXIF Viewer')
I can save them the time and trouble then. Regardless of how it turns out, voters who supported the winning candidate will have confidence in the results and voters who supported the losing candidate will be convinced there was fraud.
The thing that’s cracking me up is, when their side looked like they had won everyone here was freaking out and whining about a stolen election, bitching about ballot stuffing and trotting out the same retarded canards about dead folks voting- and as soon as it wen the other way posts worded almost exactly the same way appeared over on that other site as well as the predictable pissing and moaning about Diebold
Good grief, this country is a nation of piteous whiners; at least Nixon had some class when the Daley machine stole Illinois.
If you can’t steal as many votes, rig as many machines, bring as many dead back to life and ‘find’ as many ballot boxes as the other side, you’re as useless as a short NBA player or a 120LB defensive lineman in the NFL.