[Fresh Wind]

Here is the alleged "original" photo with areas highlighted that show clear evidence of Photoshopping. Remember this infamous picture showing alleged multiple Iranian missiles?

This was quickly debunked because of the obvious Photoshopping that is called out in this version. The same problem exists with the grandparents-minus-obama photo.

Note also the discontinuities in the bench and the top of the wall. Note the way the bench narrows as you move towards the center.

Now here's the kicker. If you take the "original" version of photo that I highlighted above, the one paulycy posted, and look at it using a hexdump program, as if by magic, the name Simon Maloy shows up, hidden within the image file. If you Google that name, the first link that pops up links him to Media Matters for America.

Another link identifies him as a "professional Rush Limbaugh watcher".

If you don't believe me, go here and download one of the hexdump utilities (I use hexdump32), and look at the file yourself.

This is a trap, people, and people like Maloy are laughing their asses off at you.

[paulycy]

Look. I’m not trying to pick a fight. It may well be photoshopped. I personally don’t care one way or the other. I have photoshopped it myself several times. It is just an interesting topic for conversation. Apparently you like to talk about it too.

Your attempt to prove it to me won’t work, but only because I don’t care enough. For what it’s worth, it probably is photoshoped but so what?

As I said, it’s fun and I don’t particularly care who might or might not be laughing at me. They are fools if they care that much about it IMO.

[paulycy]

[mad_as_he$$]

Just one question. How do you account for the wedding ring 0 is wearing when Grandpa died 9 years prior to 0 marrying the wookie?

[Fred Nerks]

There is no original photo...there is only the FAKE of the three people sitting on the bench in Central Park, to which zero has been added. The 'original' was never in the public domain.

In 2009 I asked a freeper to remove the person sitting in the centre, to see if the two elderly people fitted together - which they obviously did.

That showed zero was posed on that bench ALONE and then ADDED between the two Dunhams. Which explains the difference in the light and the need to deconstruct the wall - to make room for the added individual.

The image you are referring to - with the 'knee' - I HAVE NEVER SEEN BEFORE THIS ARTICLE WAS POSTED.

Who-ever it was that removed zero from the centre of this image, LEFT SOME OF HIM BEHIND.

I'LL SAY IT AGAIN. THERE WAS NEVER AN 'ORIGINAL PHOTO' PUBLISHED SHOWING THE DUNHAMS.

There is no TRAP, and images of Iranian rockets mean nothing.