Donald Trump Planned 2012 run 8 year ago

4/7/2011 | Jeff O

[jeffo]

I just found evidence that Donald Trump at least considered running in the upcoming presidential election 7 year ago. In December 2004 his organization registered the domain "trump2012.com":

Registrant:
The Trump Organization LLC

725 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10022
United States

Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc.
(http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: TRUMP2012.COM
Created on: 16-Dec-04
Expires on: 16-Dec-15
Last Updated on: 04-Dec-10

[Paperdoll]

Oooo! What is my problem? I doubt RWR would be so abrasive.I worked very hard on his of his campaigns. What did you do?

[LuvFreeRepublic]

You cannot get the american woman to vote for a person, that has a trophy wife, trump has had three of them. That is just a fact of life.

I disagree. American women already elected a stained dress. I think a rich man having several trophy wives is more "acceptable" to women than a serial adulterer.

[Paperdoll]

I would love to see him, on election night, say :”Mr. Obama, you are fired!”

[Antoninus]

OK so you are calling me either a fool or pretending to be a conservative. As I look up to the picture of Ronald Reagan I have hanging on my office wall, these are fighting words to be sure. You want to stick with them?

Give it a rest, tough guy. Did you see the post right after yours? #35 on this thread? Trump's track record is Democrat and liberal. Period.

I stick with my original statement. If you're offended by it, then too bad.

[winstonwolf33]

Eeww! Gross!

[Paperdoll]

I hope my fellow FReepers will get on the same band wagon this time. I agree, Republicans must unite behind one outstanding candidate this (our last?) time around. And I think Mr. Trump is that man so faar.

[Crim]

I was going to stay home in ‘08 until McCain picked Palin...

There’s your sign....

[Paperdoll]

Me too!

[Crim]

Palin / West ‘12

Know it....they can slay the beast...

But I’m sure there is plenty of time for the republicans to screw up somehow...

Watch them draft Powell....then he can drop out at the last minute and endorse Oh-dumba..

ACK!

[ScreamingFist]

These are women who I thought were supposed to be Dem voters, looking for government to take care of them. Apparently this demo may be willing to vote for a strong male presence in contrast to Obama.....

Good point Fu. Frankly, I'm voting for anyone that can beat obama of arabia. Anyone, I don't care if it's col quadaffi or hillary. In 2 short weeks Trump has went from not running to number 2 in the polls. I hope he goes all in.

[ScreamingFist]

Trump's track record is Democrat and liberal. Period.

But his interviews have not been. I assume you'll be voting for Romney or Huck....

[Huck]

You forgot about the Fred-bots and now the Palin-bots. I doubt we’ll see too many Daniels-bots, though.

[jerseyrocks]

Something Edwards would never do?

[RC2]

If Trump runs, it will be interesting to watch the debates. I don’t know of anyone, at this time, that could stand up to him. He tells it like it is and I like that.

[Crim]

I prefer the term Palin-ite...

*grin*

[rhombus]

Wow, thanks for the info. Now I’m wondering how many he has. 2024? 2028? How long does he expect to live? Or is he setting up his dynasty for a thousand years?

[Huck]

Or Palinista.

[Reagan Man]

>>>>>What is my problem?

For starters, you accused me of not citing sources for my criticism of Trump. That is simply not true. I posted linked sources of Trump's own liberal words from the book he wrote. Then you posted, the more you hear about Trump, the more you like him. I said that was your problem. You call that being abrasive. I call it, stating a factual truth.

Let me remind you. FR exists to support conservatism and conservative candidates, while opposing liberalism and liberal candidates. No doubt about it, Trump is a liberal. Lately, Trump has been pandering to conservatives. Problem is, that pandering doesn't hold up under strict scrutiny and never will.

[Paperdoll]

Reagan Man to Paperdoll >>>>>What is my problem? For starters, you accused me of not citing sources for my criticism of Trump. That is simply not true. I posted linked sources of Trump's own liberal words from the book he wrote. Then you posted, the more you hear about Trump, the more you like him. I said that was your problem. You call that being abrasive. I call it, stating a factual truth. Let me remind you. FR exists to support conservatism and conservative candidates, while opposing liberalism and liberal candidates. No doubt about it, Trump is a liberal. Lately, Trump has been pandering to conservatives. Problem is, that pandering doesn't hold up under strict scrutiny and never will. Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View 5 posted on Thursday, April 07, 2011 9:24:04 AM by Reagan Man ("In ,< The above are two of your posts to me which I originally replied to. I don't see any book by Trump mentioned. I don't see any link. Do you? I haave been a Conservative for 61 years, very active in Republican precinct work, and have participated in important campaigins on the local and national level besides bbeing a successful business womabn for most of my life. I don't need anyone telling me what to think or do, much less an upstart like "Reagan Man".

[Reagan Man]

>>>>>I don't see any book by Trump mentioned. I don't see any link. Do you? .

Yeah.