Skip to comments.
Scotland's wind farms 'often able only to boil 6,667 kettles'
scotsman.com ^
| 7 Apr 2011
| John Ross
Posted on 04/06/2011 6:31:11 PM PDT by smokingfrog
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
To: steelyourfaith
2
posted on
04/06/2011 6:40:09 PM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: smokingfrog
3
posted on
04/06/2011 6:51:50 PM PDT
by
Mr. Silverback
(Anyone who says we need illegals to do the jobs Americans won't do has never watched "Dirty Jobs.")
To: smokingfrog
They need to cover the wind turbines with arrays of OLEDs and miniature cameras so they can make them appear invisible so as not to destroy the mountain views.
The power they generate should be just enough to keep the OLEDs and cameras operational.
To: Army Air Corps
This article does not make sense. 1 MW of power is sufficient to power approximately 1,000 U.S.homes. So 20MW is enough for 20,000 homes, not a small bunch of steaming kettles.
To: smokingfrog
Any idea if they’re using the traditional type of wind turbines or if any are vertical axis? I’ve done a bit of reading on the VAWTs and they seem to be more efficient and have a smaller footprint than the regular turbines.
Yes, I know that wind power isn’t the answer to our energy needs, but new and improved wind generation can be a viable way to supplement our energy needs at times.
A vertical axis turbine with arcing blades curving 90 degrees over the full height of each blade and having a concave similar to a sail’s shape would be a big improvement over the stupid propeller blades like they have in the desert near Palm Springs.
6
posted on
04/06/2011 6:55:28 PM PDT
by
Two Kids' Dad
((((( a COLB has 13 items of info, a REAL birth certificate has 36 items of info. I want all 36 )))))
To: smokingfrog
How do those numbers compare with the nuclear power plants in Japan that are down for good?
The fastest way Japan has of getting back to minimum electrical production to power the nation is with windmills.
While the naysayers criticize, the smart money is building bigger and better windmills all over the world.
7
posted on
04/06/2011 6:56:01 PM PDT
by
larry hagedon
(born and raised and retired in Iowa.)
To: larry hagedon
THe small ones are good combined with solar panels if you are in a windy sunny place.
To: sydneysider
I guess it takes 300W to boil a kettle. 300 kW X 6667 = 20,000 kW X (1 MW/1000 kW)or 20 MW.
The problem with wind is that it is operating when people don’t the power, in the middle of the night.
9
posted on
04/06/2011 7:01:39 PM PDT
by
Perdogg
(What Would Aqua Buddha do?)
To: sydneysider
The windmills were
supposed to produce about 20MW, but actually produce less than a third of that.
Plus, they drink a lot of tea. ;-)
10
posted on
04/06/2011 7:02:26 PM PDT
by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open ( <o> ---)
To: screaminsunshine
Solar is okay, but the problem with solar is shade, cost, and lack of a payback even with a 30% tax credit.
11
posted on
04/06/2011 7:02:59 PM PDT
by
Perdogg
(What Would Aqua Buddha do?)
To: larry hagedon
Sincere question:
Why is the smart money on an industry that can never generate more than 25% of your energy needs, is unreliable as it only works when the wind blows, and from everything published here only is built in the first place with massive subsidies and continued financial support? When did it become economically competitive with existing sources?
I’d like to know. Maybe what I have read is out of date.
12
posted on
04/06/2011 7:04:28 PM PDT
by
IrishCatholic
(No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
To: smokingfrog
20MW of energy - just enough power for 6,667 households to boil their kettles. 20MW/6,667 kettles = 3KW/kettle
3KW per kettle seems way too high.
13
posted on
04/06/2011 7:04:37 PM PDT
by
fso301
To: sydneysider
sorry that was 3 kW X 6667 = 20,000 kW or 20 MW
14
posted on
04/06/2011 7:05:58 PM PDT
by
Perdogg
(What Would Aqua Buddha do?)
To: Two Kids' Dad
The "blender blades" chop the birds into smaller pieces too!
15
posted on
04/06/2011 7:08:17 PM PDT
by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open ( <o> ---)
To: sydneysider
The article notes that the wind turbines fell short of the 20MW goal.
16
posted on
04/06/2011 7:10:02 PM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: Perdogg
The problem is hassling with the batteries.
To: fso301
18
posted on
04/06/2011 7:10:14 PM PDT
by
Perdogg
(What Would Aqua Buddha do?)
To: Perdogg
The problem with wind is that it is operating when people dont the power, in the middle of the night.Best time to recharge electricc car batteries.
19
posted on
04/06/2011 7:11:07 PM PDT
by
Doe Eyes
To: fso301
The article notes that that the turbines fell short of the goal of 20MW of generation:
...all the wind turbines in Scotland linked to the National Grid produce less than 20MW of energy...
Granted, the article does not state plainly just how much power the turbines did generate during the period of the study.
20
posted on
04/06/2011 7:14:21 PM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson