Attention Bill O’Reilly: The Rest of the Story

The Post & Email ^ | April 04, 2011 | Butterdezillion

[Albertafriend]

And as Butterdezillion shows there were a whole lot more names in the Star Bulletin that were not in the Advertiser so that although the order of the names were the same up to a point, the lists were not identical. This is a very important point.

[Ladysforest]

Uh, yeah - that came out even before I collected the copies.

A few people got copies sent to them from mainland libraries back after the “first discoveries”. That’s when they found the Advertiser had a longer list and that it didn’t appear that the two papers ALWAYS published the same lists, especially in the same order, particularly a day apart.

In the two month span I have, the only time that happened was in the papers that had obama’s announcements.

[butterdezillion]

That’s ladysforest’s blog. Though she would never directly say what you said, the information she’s got definitely speaks volumes to those who are willing to think it through.

[butterdezillion]

Thank you. I wish there was a way to get this to where O’Reilly would have to see it and address it.

[woofie]

Bookmark

[LucyT]

With new information emerging now, O’Reilly may be interested to learn that the announcement images that were posted online cannot be from the microfilms we were told they were from.

This article documents that the stories we were told were a well-orchestrated lie, which raises serious questions about the microfilms O’Reilly says he has found, since those lies back in 2008 would not have been necessary if the microfilms O’Reilly relies on today had actually been in the libraries in 2008.

Who orchestrated those lies in July of 2008, and why? O’Reilly might want to send his investigators out to find the answers to those questions, since it is o'Reilly's credibility – not Trump’s – which is on the line now.

Thanks, Fractal Trader.

[butterdezillion]

That researcher claims to have proof that someone born outside the US still had their birth announced in the Hawaii papers. I wish he would publish that proof. That would make his case clearly.

[DCmarcher-976453]

Thinking you are right Butter D, this must have been done to give him the name BHO, unless in the divorce papers it says BHOjr. We need his records. Hopefully as the dems sign him into each state we can challenge his eligibility.Thanks for all your work ButterD.

[butterdezillion]

Your advice was very, very helpful - not only for this article but also for the blog as well. Thank you so much.

I do hope these facts get out to a wide audience.

[butterdezillion]

Starfelt has died? I had not heard that. What happened?

Say, I had asked you at one point if you ever saw any birth announcements that were in a different section than the classifieds, or one-year birthday celebrations - both of which were mentioned by Starfelt as the way to know which announcements were submitted by the public and which were from the HDOH. At that time you said you hadn’t seen anything like that. Is that still true, or have you since seen something like what Starfelt referred to?

Geez, I have a terrible feeling about her being dead. She wasn’t very old, was she?

[combat_boots]

kudos

[Fred Nerks]

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html

the factcheck images are still there!

[butterdezillion]

According to http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:wlENknTzw9oJ:www.facebook.com/pages/OperaWorks/170518364468+Lori+Starfelt+died&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&source=www.google.com Lori Starfelt died March 13th. I wonder what happened.

Trump’s first public comments were on March 17th.

[Ladysforest]

I only found vital stats (births) listed outside of the usual place in the paper once. And I almost zipped right past.

I don’t recall seeing “social” birth announcements. I didn’t really look for them, and I personally only searched the SB. My helper searched and copied the HA while we were at the LOC.

[Ladysforest]

About Starfelt-I read it over on WEPOTUS a little bit ago.

[woofie]

In my mind if you can prove this info is true Obamas cards take a tumble. If he willfully dece1ved people on this I think its over ....but here is the real question:
how do you prove it to the media’s satisfaction?

[ExTexasRedhead]

Perhaps the perpetrators sent it out to be forged by a new expert.

[Ladysforest]

Prove what specifically? All of my info has been out there for almost a year - it’s all easy to prove because all of the stuff I have is available to the general public.

Yes, I have published more since, but how can you force an issue that the MSM refuses to admit exists?

[woofie]

I hear ya ....and yet I remember the night Buckhead brought down Dan Rather.For some reason it caught fire. All I can think of is to look at the original source....and have a recognized expert (not a blogger) look at it.

Is this microfilm in the Hawaii archives?
Can it be accessed?

[bluecat6]

There is no one to take them down...

Someone has now taken out the Daily KOS/FTS image. But Factcheck has left their fraudulent photos online. Maybe because both ‘authors’ are gone from Factcheck.

Joe Miller is now at CBO and Jess Henig is nowhere to be found now after leaving Factcheck in January.

The images they claim to have taken are clearly frauds and are prints of the Daily KOS image. Anyone referencing these photos including Newsweek and USA Today have reference a fraud of a story.