Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jean S

The question that is not being asked, is “On what basis is this law in violation of either state or federal law?”

One would THINK that the GOP would be smart enough to run the bill through a set of legal authorities before voting on it. One would like to think that some measure of legal review took place, before the vote.


4 posted on 03/31/2011 2:02:38 PM PDT by Hodar (Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Hodar

The injunction has NOTHING to do with the constitutionallity of the law, but rather the fact that the Wisconsin State Senate voted on the bill with two hours notice to the senators. Since the Senate was in special session, under the existing State Senate rules ( interestingly written by two of the RAT Senators who were at the time “vacationing” in Illinois) this was a proper and legal procedure. According to the Marxist judge (whose son, by the way is a union organizer for the State Teachers Union) issued the injunction “because the Senate didn’t follow the State’s open meetings statute which says that all “meetings” must be given 24 hours notice.” Personally, I’m sorry that Walker has capitulated. I’d like to see him place the judge under arrest and put her in jail.


74 posted on 03/31/2011 11:36:43 PM PDT by vette6387 (Enough Already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Hodar
One would THINK that the GOP would be smart enough to run the bill through a set of legal authorities before voting on it. One would like to think that some measure of legal review took place, before the vote.

One would think that because they actually did.

77 posted on 04/01/2011 1:22:32 AM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson