Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

End the War on Drugs Now
American Thinker ^ | March 26, 2011 | Zbigniew Mazurak

Posted on 03/26/2011 12:31:16 AM PDT by neverdem

Despite federal and state expenditures of billions of dollars per year, severe punishments, and frequent unconstitutional raids on private homes, the War On Drugs is a failure.  Since this futile war began, the number of drug users in the US has grown rather than shrink, and the rate of drug usage has grown along with the profits of drug cartels.  America's Southern border has become very dangerous as a result of the War, and Mexico is a failing state because wealthy, well-armed drug cartels can afford to fight a regular war in that country and bribe (or assassinate) its officials.

By any objective measure, the War On Drugs is a disastrous failure. It's time to end this madness now.


The War began in 1970, when President Nixon declared it and the Congress passed various legislation outlawing drugs (even relatively harmless ones such as marijuana).  The Congress didn't even bother to change the Constitution (as it did when it banned alcohol beverages), and simply ignored the strict limits the Constitution imposed on it.

Since then, federal and state authorities have been arresting and prosecuting just about anyone they caught possessing, growing, using, or selling drugs.  It doesn't matter to them that to date, no one has died because of ingesting marijuana, while thousands of people die every die around the world as a result of overuse of alcohol and smoking tobacco.  Moreover, alcoholics and tobacco smokers harm not only themselves, but also everyone else in their orbit.

Even by the 1980s, there were signs that the punitive policies were failing. Nonetheless, Washington politicians didn't end the War - they doubled on it.

They ignored the lessons of the Prohibition Era, when alcohol prohibition drove distillers underground, but did not eliminate alcohol from the private market.  Even worse, the alcohol market was monopolized by gangs, including the Mafia, making Al Capone a very wealthy man.  These gangs were terrorizing adults on streets everyday, and drive-by shootings were common. The same dismal results occurred everywhere where prohibition of alcohol (or drugs) has been tried, including Russia under Gorbachyov.  Al Capone opposed the 21st Amendment (which ended the Prohibition), because it opened the door to the legalization of alcohol, thus creating numerous legal, law-abiding competitors for him.  Capone went to jail in 1932, before Prohibition ended, but its end radically decreased his Mafia's annual income.

What are the results of the War on Drugs?

A million innocent Americans are sitting in  prisons right now solely because they've been caught storing, buying or using drugs.  A million people who haven't harmed anyone else. Americans prisons are overcrowded as a result.

Taxpayers dollars and limited police resources are being squandered on arresting people who may have harmed themselves but haven't harmed anyone else, rather than be used chasing truly dangerous criminals.

America's Southern border is dangerous and de facto governed by drug cartels, which are also present in hundreds of American cities, even NYC, Chicago, Tacoma, and Anchorage.

Drug gangs have high annual incomes, and therefore can afford to buy lethal weapons, bribe officials, and build villas for their leaders.  This income is not taxed.

Meanwhile, Americans who want to buy drugs for recreational (or even medical) purposes are forced to buy them from these gangs rather than pharmacies.  These drug cartels also supply weapons to other criminal organizations, and could sell them to terrorists.

During the last two decades, a few states, such as California, have legalized medical marijuana and proposed to legalize recreational weed.  Government officials and cops, eager to protect their bloated bureaucracies and budgets as well as their police prerogatives, opposed these initiatives.  Sometimes these policies were approved by voters, sometimes not. But whenever they came up for a vote, government officials said they would disregard the result (i.e. the people's verdict) and enforce federal drug laws anyway.

Such was the case with the 2010 Proposition #19 in California.  Its citizens submitted a proposal to legalize marijuana (at least for medicinal purposes) in a referendum, Washington politicians arrogantly promised to disregard the results before such referendums occurred, and discredited establishment politicians, led by George Shultz (a man who shouldn't even dare to speak publicly) and Arnold Schwarzenegger in California, spoke out against such proposals.  They, like all other liberals, believe that the government should decide for private citizens what's best for them, like a nanny state; that adults are too stupid to decide for them. Proposition #19 failed.  Luckily, Arizona voters passed a similar measure, Proposition #203.

What if the War on Drugs is ended and drugs are legalized?

The US prison population would immediately shrink by a million people, thus stripping dictators around the world of the argument that the US incarceration rate is.  Prison expenditures would decrease significantly.  There would now be enough cells to lock up all truly dangerous criminals, rather than people who may be harming themselves but aren't doing harm to anyone else.

Annual federal expenditures would shrink by at least $44 billion and, if drugs are taxed, annual federal revenue would grow by $33 billion.  States' coffers could be similarly filled with revenue and state expenses would shrink.

Drug gangs would lose their source of income and would cease being able to buy weapons, bribe officials with big money, and assassinate people.  They would stop being able to terrorize people on the streets, travelers on America's borders, or the country of Mexico.

Police resources would be allocated to real priorities (i.e. fighting dangerous criminals), and courts' dockets would be significantly reduced.

Truly ill people who need medical marijuana (which can be medically beneficial) would be able to buy (or grow) it legally, with doctors' prescriptions, and youngsters who want to use it for recreational purposes could do so too; they wouldn't need to fear overzealous cops and punishment that would make these decent people into criminals.

Finally, the size, scope, budget and prerogatives of the federal government would be significantly decreased.  That is also the real reason why politicians and bureaucrats oppose drug legalization.  They don't want to see the federal government and its prerogatives reduced.  They are addicted to it, and addiction to governing is more dangerous than addiction to drugs.  They couldn't care less whether the American people live healthy lifestyles or not (and to be honest, it's none of their business).  They just want to micromanage Americans and their lifestyles.

It's time to end the War on Drugs.  It's not a conservative policy, its results are dismal, its costly, and it has made America's drug problem worse, not better.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Mexico; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: warondrugs; waronsomedrugs; wod; wosd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last
To: oldasrocks

“Why not legalize all drugs?”

Given their druthers, I suspect that a few states probably would. I personally disagree with it and hope that Virginia stays on the prohibition end of the spectrum. That said, I’m a states-rights kinda guy and think that the states should be free to plot their own course. Oh, and the Federal WOD is an absolute failure and should be ended yesterday.


81 posted on 03/26/2011 4:59:36 PM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Repudiate the national debt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
...and (2) it's an issue that is so easy for an opposing candidate to demagogue if you take a principled stand (no matter what stand you take).

That's it in a nutshell.

If you can't appreciate the pure beauty of the violin after hearing this, something's wrong with your ears.

82 posted on 03/27/2011 12:14:43 AM PDT by rdb3 (The mouth is the exhaust pipe of the heart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I agree with every word of this piece. And one more thing not mentioned by the author:

This arrangement has sent a terrible msg to children. In poor neighborhoods, the only guys with money are the ones tied to dealers. This becomes, to them, a viable career choice.

It reminds me of the stories I used to overhear as a little kid; about the regular people tossing coins on the statue of Mary during the Feast of the Assumption parade in August, while the Mafia members were pinning hundred dollar bills on the float.


83 posted on 03/27/2011 4:05:53 AM PDT by Daisyjane69 (Michael Reagan: "Welcome back, Dad, even if you're wearing a dress and bearing children this time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy; Clintonfatigued
Doubling down and increasing the penalties, including a much wider usage of the death penalty is the way to go.

Drugs have been one of the most usefully weapons the anti-American forces have used to destroy the USA.

84 posted on 03/27/2011 9:23:40 AM PDT by GOPsterinMA (Some men DO just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Daisyjane69

Common sense bump!!!


85 posted on 03/27/2011 9:57:35 AM PDT by dcwusmc (A FREE People have no sovereign save Almighty GOD!!! III OK We are EVERYWHERE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: metesky

Don’t close the bomb factory, George!

It was some of those long ago great threads that partly inspired me to join FR in early ‘01 - I came for the election controversy, I stayed for the drug debate threads!

Cheers!


86 posted on 03/27/2011 10:11:18 AM PDT by headsonpikes (Genocide is the highest sacrament of socialism - "Who-whom?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite
  “drug education,” etc.

   Yes - so many government programs for everything. It's something else that could be handled better privately through friends, family, charity, churches, etc.

Would you give up your favorite federal programs if it meant you'd never have to pay income tax again? - Harry Browne

and without income taxes and an overreaching government, I do think that there would be many more charitable organizations to help people in all sorts of trouble
87 posted on 03/27/2011 2:32:05 PM PDT by Maurice Tift (You can't stop the signal, Mal. You can never stop the signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes

Good to see you still here and still punching, FRiend!


88 posted on 03/27/2011 3:55:43 PM PDT by metesky (My retirement fund is holding steady @ $.05 a can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson