Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(RINO) Cantor says Congress unlikely to get rid of mortgage interest deduction
The Hill, Washington, DC ^ | 2011-03-24 | Molly K. Hooper

Posted on 03/24/2011 6:24:09 PM PDT by rabscuttle385

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last
"Before we start thinking about some other scheme that the government can do to help us..."

What schemes are you thinking of, Rep. Cantor? Another bailout (like the ones in 2008 that you supported)?

"The nine most terrifying words in the English language are:
'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.'"

1 posted on 03/24/2011 6:24:13 PM PDT by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Ya think.....You'd have people burning down DC.

Don't worry...they'll get you another way...

2 posted on 03/24/2011 6:28:39 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

BTW, I’m going to see Eric Cantor tomorrow (Friday) in Greeley, Colorado.

Anyone have anything you want me to ask him if I get a chance?


3 posted on 03/24/2011 6:29:10 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Made from the right stuff!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

What’s wrong with not getting rid of the mortgage interest deduction?


4 posted on 03/24/2011 6:29:10 PM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (When evolution is outlawed, only outlaws will believe in abject nonsense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

In a perfect world, we’d turn Social Security into a Welfare program (which it is, in actuality)...we’d also get rid of the mortgage interest deduction (which is simply IDIOTIC, the idea being to reward debt).

However, we don’t live in that world. So, if the House passes the above...the Senate kills it, Obama DEMOGOUGES it, and the Republicans get their heads handed to them in 2012.

So why do it? How about we take the Senate in 2012, and take the Presidency, with Michelle B....and then deal with the problems - when we could actually fix them.


5 posted on 03/24/2011 6:31:04 PM PDT by BobL (PLEASE READ: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2657811/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Remove the mortgage exemption and watch the bottom really fall out of the housing market. Everyone will be walking away from “underwater” mortgages (and many more that are not under water).


6 posted on 03/24/2011 6:33:00 PM PDT by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
What’s wrong with not getting rid of the mortgage interest deduction?

Because it gives preferential treatment to home buyers who purchase with debt over home buyers who purchase with cash or those who must rent.

Because it's a form of social engineering through the tax code.

7 posted on 03/24/2011 6:34:12 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
(RINO) Cantor says Congress unlikely to get rid of mortgage interest deduction

Why does that make him a RINO? Are you laboring under the false belief that most Republicans want the interest deduction taken away?

8 posted on 03/24/2011 6:36:15 PM PDT by krb (Obama is a miserable failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catnipman
I’m going to see Eric Cantor tomorrow... Anyone have anything you want me to ask him if I get a chance?

Yeah, ask him why Palin and Bachmann have more bulk in their Jockey shorts than he does.

9 posted on 03/24/2011 6:36:26 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) on Thursday said Congress is unlikely to take away the popular mortgage interest tax break. Speaking to a crowd of real estate professionals in his hometown, Cantor said the tax would be considered as part of the larger tax reform discussion.

Interesting that the author of the article cites Cantor as saying the tax (mortgage deduction) would be linked with a larger discussion on tax reform. Again, MSM is trying to link Cantor/Repubs as wanting to raise taxes.

I support Cantor in this statement. Any tax reform should be done as part of a total tax package, and not line item changes to the current tax system. Reduce the budget and fix the tax system, but keep the legislation on both items separate.

10 posted on 03/24/2011 6:37:01 PM PDT by mlocher (Is it time to cash in before I am taxed out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Because it gives preferential treatment to home buyers who purchase with debt over home buyers who purchase with cash or those who must rent.

So?

11 posted on 03/24/2011 6:37:08 PM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (When evolution is outlawed, only outlaws will believe in abject nonsense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bwc2221

It is falling now. How much government intervention do you want to keep it up?


12 posted on 03/24/2011 6:37:14 PM PDT by nomorelurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BobL

Speaking of Michelle, or any other woman who might think of running for President, after 4 years of Obama-trauma the American people may well be very tired of “variety” in their Presidents.


13 posted on 03/24/2011 6:39:08 PM PDT by muawiyah (Make America Safe For Amercans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

I DO!

What is it going to take to get him to resign.

I’m really sick of his BS!


14 posted on 03/24/2011 6:39:16 PM PDT by Randy Larsen ( BTW, If I offend you! Please let me know, I may want to offend you again!(FR #1690))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Is eric cantor gay?


15 posted on 03/24/2011 6:39:33 PM PDT by muddler (Diligentia, Vis and Celeritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL
we’d also get rid of the mortgage interest deduction (which is simply IDIOTIC, the idea being to reward debt).

Depends, for those who believe that all money belongs to the governement first, tax deductions are idiotic.

For those of us who believe that the money we earn belong to us, well, it's just an earnings punishment avoided.

16 posted on 03/24/2011 6:41:12 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Overproduction, one of the top five worries of the American Farmer each and every year..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

I would be fine with doing away with the mortgage int. deduction if I only had to pay some sort of comsumption tax, but at this point it’s a way for self employed people to lower their taxable income.


17 posted on 03/24/2011 6:46:49 PM PDT by Tuscaloosa Goldfinch ( T.G., global warming denier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BobL
we’d also get rid of the mortgage interest deduction (which is simply IDIOTIC, the idea being to reward debt).

There's nothing wrong with debt - so long as it's a manageable part of your budget, and you acknowledge up front that it is going to be an expense that you are willing to shoulder.

This idea that we're all supposed to throw our money down the toilet renting until we finally have the $150,000 or whatever saved up to plop a suitcase full of money down on the broker's table and buy a house outright is ludicrous nonsense in this day and age. Hate to break it to people, but we no longer live in an America where you can buy a homestead for cents and acre. Real estate is an increasingly demand-side commodity, and despite the recent downturn, we should not expect that market to stay tanked forever.

Bush was right to laud the personal and societal benefits of home ownership - he was just wrong in using the government to pressure lenders to make high-risk loans to people who didn't have either the wherewithal or the discipline to otherwise be able to get a bank to loan them money.

As it stands, I think it's a pretty stupid thing to expect everybody to rent apartments except for the 1% who can reasonably expect to have the ready cash available to buy a house outright. From a housing standpoint, I can think of few things that would make the Marxists happier.

18 posted on 03/24/2011 6:47:07 PM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (When evolution is outlawed, only outlaws will believe in abject nonsense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

It’s the left that wants to get rid of the mortgage interest deduction. More gubmint revenue. Unfair to minorities. Helps the wealthy. Blah, blah, blah.

BTW: Do renters pay property tax? How’s that fair.


19 posted on 03/24/2011 6:47:45 PM PDT by nhwingut (Palin '12... Accept No Other)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Removing it is also an instantaneous transfer of wealth from home owners to non-home owners. People buy homes based on cash flow. Remove it and everyone who owns a home has it reduced in value instantly. Sounds a little like redistribution of wealth.


20 posted on 03/24/2011 6:48:50 PM PDT by ScarletRed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson