OK. So, her position is that so long as we don't turn over control, then Qadaffi will just leave? Is that her position?
"I see nothing about ground troops."
Right. Neither do I. How do you square that with "Gaddafi must go". How does she suggest that happen?
Her position was that once 0bama stated that policy it was now the mission and anything less than that objective would make us look weak.
Palin also said in the same interview that the rebels would probably kill Qadaffi.
[Right. Neither do I. How do you square that with “Gaddafi must go”. How does she suggest that happen? ]
Here’s the problem for Republicans - none of our candidates would be in this position. They would either have moved quickly with congressional involvement), or they wouldn’t have been involved. Trying to get Palin or anyone else to say something cogent about a FUBAR situation is pretty difficult.
Yes Gaddafi must go, about twenty years ago. No, NATO can’t run anything but a squirrel factory. If you were going to war, Gadaffi should have been taken out the first week. And no, if Muhbarack hadn’t been tossed under the bus, you probably wouuldn’t have a Libyan revolt.
Re-engineering Obama’s incompetence is doomed to failure. Same reason Obamacare has to go.
Why don’t you wait and find out.
And, be it noted that once we’ve committed our military to something Sarah will not be one to ‘down’ the mission. She cannot control what Obama is doing, but I don’t believe that she’s the type who will speak against something our troops have been committed to BY BARACK OBAMA. So, perhaps your criticism is best pointed at Barry.
Maybe he gets shot in the head?