There is another reason to oppose Sarah e.g. her role in goading Obama into the Libya quagmire. This makes her damaged goods more than anything. Never forget! The GOP should only nominate a candidate who opposed intervention in that cesspool.
“There is another reason to oppose Sarah e.g. her role in goading Obama into the Libya quagmire. This makes her damaged goods more than anything. Never forget! The GOP should only nominate a candidate who opposed intervention in that cesspool.”
You’ve been here since 1998? I doubt it.
And who would that be, Cap'n?
If Saint Sarah had advocated a nuclear strike, the Palindrones here would be all for it.
However, I doubt that she had any influence on Obama’s decision.
So you are saying it’s Sarah’s fault that Obama is bombing Libya?
Did you just drop in from DU with an alias?
Shouldn’t you be renting a blimp and organizing a money bomb for somebody?