Where in this letter does Obama provide the authorization to attack a sovereign nation in direct violation of the US Constitution and the War Powers Act??
1 posted on
03/22/2011 8:53:35 AM PDT by
Thanatos
To: Thanatos
2 posted on
03/22/2011 8:55:55 AM PDT by
Grunthor
(hcg diet, down 32 lbs in 5 weeks)
To: Thanatos
Right there in the signature block where it says (.)bama. Afterall, anyone with the power to declare laws unconstitutional equally has the power to declare war. The letter was just sent over to his fawns on the Hill for his amusement.
The 3 Card Monte Dealer just moves along.
3 posted on
03/22/2011 8:57:08 AM PDT by
Mouton
(Government expands to fill any voids in freedom.)
To: Thanatos
"For these purposes, I have directed these actions, which are in the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States"
Oh come on, Really?
4 posted on
03/22/2011 8:58:19 AM PDT by
jaydubya2
To: Thanatos
Buck Farak!
No War for Oil!
5 posted on
03/22/2011 8:58:53 AM PDT by
MIchaelTArchangel
(Obama makes me miss Jimmah Cahtah!)
To: Thanatos
True, but why is the milk toast speaker not on the house floor demanding a vote to cut off funding. And forming an impeachment committee.
To: Thanatos
According to the War Resolution Act of 1973, the president has 48 hours to notify the Congress after committing troops to military action. If Congress doesn’t authorize the military action, then the president can keep the military force in the area of action for 90 days. (60 days for action, 30 days to withdraw)
7 posted on
03/22/2011 9:08:18 AM PDT by
carton253
To: Thanatos
authorized by the United Nations (U.N.) Security Council and undertaken with the support of European allies and Arab partners, to prevent a humanitarian catastrophe and address the threat posed to international peace and security by the crisis in Libya. Wonderful, daisy-filled reason, but unfortunately UN resolutions do not circumvent the US Constitution, no matter how much Obowma despises it.
8 posted on
03/22/2011 9:08:39 AM PDT by
snowrip
(Liberal? You are a socialist idiot with no rational argument.)
To: Thanatos
It appears to me that 0bama has always held the notion that the UN should be in charge of all nations..that there should be a president of the world headquartered at the UN. This would then destroy the sovereignty of all nations which goes along with his pronouncement that no nation is better than another except in regard to wealth and in that matter we the USA will have to carry the lions share of the burden to help the other third world nations ( can we say Kenya) achieve a better standard of living and by happenstance we will then have our standard of lowered..too bad so sad for the USA...Oh and like Clinton, he fashions himself as President of the World...
To: Thanatos
On his show last night Judge Napalitano insisted that the war is unconstitutional.
13 posted on
03/22/2011 9:28:10 AM PDT by
freespirited
(Truth is the new hate speech. -- Pamela Geller)
To: Thanatos
This ‘letter’ which doesn’t even have Obama’s signature on it, is missing a time stamp. When was it issued?
14 posted on
03/22/2011 9:32:03 AM PDT by
Hoodat
(Yet in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us. - (Rom 8:37))
To: Thanatos
To: Thanatos
Allow me to translate the following gibberish into English:
"At approximately 3:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time, on March 19, 2011, at my direction, U.S. military forces commenced operations to assist an international effort authorized by the United Nations (U.N.) Security Council and undertaken with the support of European allies and Arab partners, to prevent a humanitarian catastrophe and address the threat posed to international peace and security by the crisis in Libya. As part of the multilateral response authorized under U.N. Security Council Resolution 1973, U.S. military forces, under the command of Commander, U.S. Africa Command, began a series of strikes against air defense systems and military airfields for the purposes of preparing a no-fly zone. These strikes will be limited in their nature, duration, and scope. Their purpose is to support an international coalition as it takes all necessary measures to enforce the terms of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1973. These limited U.S. actions will set the stage for further action by other coalition partners."
"I AM A TOTAL WUSS" - Barry Soetoro.
27 posted on
03/22/2011 10:07:30 AM PDT by
Uncle Miltie
(Allah sucks pig teat.)
To: Thanatos
The real problem here is Obama’s ideology is that military force should only be applied to avert a significant humanitarian crisis; and then ONLY with the blessing of a coalition of nations.
When Americans are killed at random by terrorists, Obama does not believe that military force should be used in retaliation. To him this is not a significant humanitarian crisis.
This is why many Americans are likely to die under Obama, because the rest of the maniacal tyrants/terrorists in the world know this too.
Obama’s strategy is simply to “absorb” the attack. He has stated that. It is easy to say things like that when you have 24x7 security from the Secret Service. I guess it will be us peasants that will die in airplanes when they are shot down or blown up, or when the Islamic militant opens up with an AK in the local shopping mall.
Obama will do nothing.
30 posted on
03/22/2011 2:47:04 PM PDT by
Gabrial
(The Whitehouse Nightmare will continue as long as the Nightmare is in the Whitehouse)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson