Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Small amounts of radiation headed for California, but no health risk seen
LA Times ^ | 3/17/11 | Ralph Vartabedian

Posted on 03/17/2011 12:37:04 AM PDT by Libloather

Small amounts of radiation headed for California, but no health risk seen
By Ralph Vartabedian, Los Angeles Times
March 17, 2011

Small amounts of radioactive isotopes from the crippled Japanese nuclear power plant are being blown toward North America high in the atmosphere over the Pacific Ocean and will reach California as soon as Friday, according to experts.

A network of sensors in the U.S. and around the world is watching for the first signs of that fallout, though experts said they were confident that the amount of radiation would be well within safe limits.

Operated by the Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. network known as Radnet is a system of 100 radiation monitors that work 24 hours a day, spread across the country in places such as Anaheim, Bakersfield and Eureka. In addition, a network of 63 sensors is operated by the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization, an international agency allied with the United Nations.

Atmospheric experts said the material should begin showing up on the West Coast as early as Friday, though it could take up to an additional week for the 5,000-mile trip from Japan to Southern California. Although the organization has told its member countries that the first indication of radiation would hit on Friday, the plume from a North Korean nuclear test in 2006 took about two weeks to travel to North America, U.N. officials said.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Japan; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; health; japan; radiation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
I've been pretty much pounded. Ate plenty of beef in Europe during the mad cow madness - which puts me out of any blood donation consideration. Was under the Chernobyl cloud for months. Even grew up near Johns-Manville - the manufactures of asbestos. Say, what kind of insulation was in those middle schools, back in the day?

Just to let you know - things are fine. I'm still standing and there's absolutely nothing wrong wi

1 posted on 03/17/2011 12:37:12 AM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

How High is “high” in the atmosphere, and what got that material up there? It was practically at sea level.


2 posted on 03/17/2011 12:43:26 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Nice. I’m pretty sure the time to panic was yesterday. I estimate it is approximately 1 million billion times worse than I first suspected.


3 posted on 03/17/2011 12:44:50 AM PDT by douginthearmy (out of the army. now a soldier of misfortune.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Just had a little 2.2 earthquake here California...


4 posted on 03/17/2011 12:46:03 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Maybe California will absorb the radiation before it gets to Arizona?


5 posted on 03/17/2011 12:48:07 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Judas Iscariot - the first social justice advocate. John 12:3-6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

In other news, millions of asteroids are buzzing around in outer space. Experts say risk of major impact is small.


6 posted on 03/17/2011 12:48:26 AM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Or the radiation cloud hits mexico before california...


7 posted on 03/17/2011 12:49:38 AM PDT by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I think Obama should spend this next vacation in California, to show there’s absolutely nothing to worry about, and to put some coin into California’s economy.


8 posted on 03/17/2011 12:58:23 AM PDT by Darkwolf377
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
That is what I was thinking. The explosions didn't go very high into the sky and the debris and dust dissipated pretty quickly.
9 posted on 03/17/2011 1:01:41 AM PDT by rlferny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

After China tested a nuke in the atmosphere........about 30 years ago the band of radioactivity circled the globe.

Statistics showed an increase in birth defects under that band of radioactivity.

Farmers in PA were ordered not to graze their cattle but use stored feed instead.

We travelled thru the area to double check. The cattle were grazing on the grass which meant their milk and meat was contaminated, which would have led to the increase in birth defects.

It’s so long ago I no longer have my documentation but for now it would be a good idea to pass up on buying produce from CA.


10 posted on 03/17/2011 1:01:48 AM PDT by Carley (WISCONSIN STREET NO DIFFERENT THAN THE ARAB STREET. UGLY AND VIOLENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlferny
Exactly, nothing like the driving force of a nuclear explosion, and nothing like the convective effects of a nuclear fireball to push the material into any part of the upper atmosphere.

So, back to it, "How high is high, and how did it get there?"

We should all want to know.

I smell some heavy panic mongering on the horizon.

11 posted on 03/17/2011 1:05:37 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Carley
for now it would be a good idea to pass up on buying produce from CA.

Or rinse it first.

12 posted on 03/17/2011 1:06:10 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Judas Iscariot - the first social justice advocate. John 12:3-6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Carley
There is a big difference between a nuclear explosion in atmosphere and a fire at sea level carrying away some material in smoke and steam. Even the hydrogen explosion on the site was a popcorn fart next to a nuclear warhead. One has tremendously more energy to push radioactive material up into the atmosphere. The other, not so much.

That is why I am having problems understanding this scenario.

13 posted on 03/17/2011 1:09:38 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Libloather


14 posted on 03/17/2011 1:12:29 AM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

Understand this.........governments lie lie and lie some more.

Pregnant women, infants and children need our protection.

I had a newborn and a toddler when the China bomb hit the USA. We switched to powdered milk, dried fruits and veggies from our local co op and tried to minimize outdoor playing on the grass for a couple of months.

Nothing lost and a small semblance of peace of mind.


15 posted on 03/17/2011 1:20:39 AM PDT by Carley (WISCONSIN STREET NO DIFFERENT THAN THE ARAB STREET. UGLY AND VIOLENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Carley
Oh, I agree that governments lie. Especially nowadays. The 64,000 dollar question remians one of how high in the atmosphere, and how did it get there?

Keep in mind that the media are in the business of selling soap--(advertising)--and that is based on ratings, and gloom, doom, and apocalypse sell like hotcakes.

Without facts, a number of people may have adverse reactions to substances used as prophylaxis for a non-existent threat.

I note that there may well be a problem, but I'm the 'doubting Thomas' who wants to understand what, why, how (did it get there), and what to do about it. Those questions were part of the basic framework of any good news story, (Who, What, Where, When, How, and Why), and are sadly ignored in what passes for journalism in this era of hype, obfustication, and dissimilation.

By all means, take the precautions you find necessary, I won't fault anyone for that. It is just that facts seem to be conspicuously lacking.

16 posted on 03/17/2011 1:33:58 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Oh no you don’t. We’re SHARING!!!!!!


17 posted on 03/17/2011 1:38:34 AM PDT by Brad’s Gramma (Where do YOU stand in your relationship with God???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

lol - it’s raining in Calif. Hope it stops by Friday and a big 90mph wind blows this stuff on thru to Nevada where it belongs (ducking...)


18 posted on 03/17/2011 2:26:59 AM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
From BBC Tweet.

0825: Low concentrations of radioactive particles are heading eastwards from Fukushima towards North America, a Swedish official is quoted as saying by Reuters. Lars-Erik De Geer, research director at the Swedish Defence Research Institute, a government agency, was citing data from a network of international monitoring stations, but stressed the levels were not dangerous for people.

19 posted on 03/17/2011 2:27:47 AM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Think we could get them to broadcast warnings in Spanish, it might help some illegals decide to vamoose....


20 posted on 03/17/2011 2:32:00 AM PDT by rolling_stone ( *this makes Watergate look like a kiddie pool*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson