Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pieceofthepuzzle
I understand that there are multiple levels of complexity, but it just seems so ironic that you have nuclear plants next to the sea, in an area that was just overrun by a Tsunami, but there isn't enough water to prevent the spent fuel from combusting.

There is enough water, it's just that the stuff which needs the water is so radioactive nobody can stay long enough to pour much water *on* it.

And the less water, the hotter (temp-wise) it gets; and if it gets hot enough, it will (presumably) catch fire (dispersion), or melt through its holder and through the floor, until it hits groundwater (massive steam explosion and dispersion).

Full Disclosure: The last sentence is my educated layman's guesstimate of the possible bad next step...

Cheers!

280 posted on 03/15/2011 9:18:48 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers

I would imagine we will wake up to work of a 7+ quake


283 posted on 03/15/2011 9:20:36 PM PDT by silentknight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson