Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Third Reactor at Fukushima Nuclear Plant Explodes
ABC ^ | March 14, 2011 | DAVID MUIR AND JESSICA HOPPER

Posted on 03/14/2011 5:27:49 PM PDT by gandalftb

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-210 next last
To: RummyChick

Would be nice to have real actual televised live camcorder at these plants. Or are there? And what about these workers? How many have camera phones?


121 posted on 03/14/2011 6:37:18 PM PDT by Varsity Flight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: meyer

If the spike’s from noble metals, it’ll drop quickly. I haven’t been able to determine that yet.


122 posted on 03/14/2011 6:37:32 PM PDT by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes
I swear, reading FR tonight, you would think freepers WANT a catastrophe.

Thanks. I'm attempting to put reason back into the equation.

But I'm beginning to wonder about the sanity of people in general. Reason has been lost.

123 posted on 03/14/2011 6:38:35 PM PDT by SteamShovel ("Does the noise in my head bother you?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

Of the two possibilities, Core melting is the good one.

Fuel meltdown is the bad one.


124 posted on 03/14/2011 6:38:49 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi
"Even in Chernobyl, Kiev at 50 miles from the plant was entirely unaffected."
Saying it was ENTIRELY unaffected is intellectually dishonest. What are you, doing damage control for TEPCO, or just plain good ole denial?
125 posted on 03/14/2011 6:39:18 PM PDT by JadeEmperor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape

“Radiation is feared”

IOW, they don’t know whether there actually *is* a radiation leak, they don’t know where the explosion occurred.

They don’t know anything.


126 posted on 03/14/2011 6:39:24 PM PDT by BenKenobi (Don't expect to build up the weak by pulling down the strong. - Silent Cal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

AIT - meant to mention the other day - I’m glad that you’re OK.


127 posted on 03/14/2011 6:40:48 PM PDT by meyer (We will not sit down and shut up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

From everything I have read the water drowned the on-site generators and the secondary hookups for truck-based generators were flooded as well. By the time they got the second set of generators connected the battery backups were depleted and water had stopped flowing.


128 posted on 03/14/2011 6:42:12 PM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: DB

I’ve been through 6’s all the way from five miles to 150 miles from the epicenter. I’ll testify that 150 is better.


129 posted on 03/14/2011 6:42:22 PM PDT by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: SteamShovel
But I'm beginning to wonder about the sanity of people in general.

This is what is going on in a nut shell, you guys cannot handle losing control of this situation. That manifests itself as you idiotically stating everything is okay as Nuclear Reactor buildings explode.

130 posted on 03/14/2011 6:42:56 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: de.rm

“With the budget they had, I can think of many fail safe simple designs that would prevent this”

Yeah but did you think of them 20-30 years ago when they were built?


131 posted on 03/14/2011 6:43:58 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (Great children's books - http://www.UsborneBooksGA.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf
> No, they DID plan for tsunami’s, but not the 500-year ones. and you can clearly see the tsunami wall in the pictures of the plant. It’s like living in a 500 year flood plain. Yeah, you COULD get flooded, but do you spend the money to insure against an event quite unlikely to happen in your, or anyone you know that is cuurently alive’s lifetime?

You said what I meant, better than I did. I didn't mean they didn't guard against tsunamis at all, but rather that they only did what was economical, which is to ignore the ones you can't afford to protect against.

Every design engineer, including myself, who has had to design a defense against a threat of unknown size, has to decide, "Well, we can afford to defend against THIS much, but if nature throws more than that at us, we fold."

Economics has to win against over-design, or else the design never gets built. Unfortunately, in the case of 500-year events, over-design could still have been insufficient. This was one heck of a tsunami.

132 posted on 03/14/2011 6:44:11 PM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: SteamShovel

Not so much loss of sanity, but loss of responsibility - in mindlessly spreading fear rumors and speculation - and the ability to not panic.


133 posted on 03/14/2011 6:45:20 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak

Yup, the generators quit when swamped by the Tsunami. When that happened, the batteries cut in. They worked ‘til exhausted eight hours or so later. The plant stops producing power when it’s “scrammed”, thus the need for external power as soon as the quake hit.


134 posted on 03/14/2011 6:46:08 PM PDT by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi
They don’t know anything.

Precisely what I have been trying to tell you now for about 3 days. They have no clue to know what is going on inside the reactor. Absolutely no clue at all. We had to wait 5 years to learn that TMI had suffered a significant partial meltdown. In that scenario, it is always prudent to assume the worse. Why would you assume the best if you knew no one on the planet had a clue ?

135 posted on 03/14/2011 6:46:48 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: DB
San Francisco is ON the San Andreas Fault.

Really? Hmmmmm...and SF is saturated with hippies, yippies, lefties, socisalists, gays, lesbians, etc., as well as being a demoRAT hotbed, right? Hmmmmm...interesting!

136 posted on 03/14/2011 6:47:47 PM PDT by rcrngroup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape

Amazing how some people on FR seem to be the modern technology version of cargo cultists or something. Anyone interested in or presenting actual news are called panickers, paranoia obsessed, etc.

It’s quite an eye-opener.


137 posted on 03/14/2011 6:47:54 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: ScreamingFist

I’m gonna get me a cow, slather it with barbecue sauce, and hang out on the east side of it ‘til the cloud blows through. Good eatin’!


138 posted on 03/14/2011 6:49:17 PM PDT by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

So news from TEPCO is mere rumors and speculation?

BREAKING NEWS: TEPCO admits possibility of meltdown at Fukushima reactors (09:29)

FLASH: Fukushima’s No. 2 reactor container damaged, radiation leak feared (09:41)

http://www.kyodonews.jp/english/


139 posted on 03/14/2011 6:50:05 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape
idiotically stating everything is okay

Not going Chernobyl over and over again is different from saying everything is ok.

as Nuclear Reactor buildings explode.

You do understand this is quite different than "Reactor Explodes" as the headline would imply, yes?

140 posted on 03/14/2011 6:51:04 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-210 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson