Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Third Reactor at Fukushima Nuclear Plant Explodes
ABC ^ | March 14, 2011 | DAVID MUIR AND JESSICA HOPPER

Posted on 03/14/2011 5:27:49 PM PDT by gandalftb

There was a new explosion Tuesday morning at a reactor the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, and the company that runs the plant said water may be leaking from the reactor.

Half of the rods inside the reactor were not immersed in water and the suppression pool, which holds the water used to keep the rods cool, seemed to be damaged, according to Tokyo Electric Co. and government officials.

The level of radiation also rose around the reactor, but a government official said there was no danger.

"The radioactive level near unit 2 has gone up, but at this juncture, the level is not judged to be immediately harmful to human bodies," said Noriyuki Shikata, a spokesman in the prime minister's office.

The blast is the third at the plant in the three days since a powerful earthquake struck Japan on Friday.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: japan; japanearthquake; nuclear; tsunami
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-210 next last
Additional: For the first time there was some rupture of the containment vessel.

All but 50 workers are being evacuated.

1 posted on 03/14/2011 5:27:54 PM PDT by gandalftb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

Next.


2 posted on 03/14/2011 5:29:27 PM PDT by screaminsunshine (34 States)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

It only takes one to start leaking badly to force the workers to retreat. If that happens the other reactors will go too.


3 posted on 03/14/2011 5:31:06 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

As my professor said today, DON’T BUILD A NUCLEAR REACTOR NEAR A FAULT LINE.

There is one directly on the San Andreas fault too.

No doubt when the inevitable happens, and that one gets hit by an earthquake, the left will use the disaster to end all nuclear power in the US.

There are a MILLION great places in America to build nuclear plants. The San Andreas fault is NOT one of them.

“Diablo Canyon” indeed.


4 posted on 03/14/2011 5:31:46 PM PDT by Christian Engineer Mass (25ish Cambridge MA grad student. Many younger conservative Christians out there? __ Click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

They are still calling it “injecting water into the reactor”
instead of “pouring water on an exploding molten heap”


5 posted on 03/14/2011 5:31:48 PM PDT by omega4179
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

Lord have mercy !


6 posted on 03/14/2011 5:31:48 PM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

That’s 3.

Under Emergency are 6...


7 posted on 03/14/2011 5:31:51 PM PDT by Freddd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: omega4179

I’d be really surprised if a bunch of Obamaites don’t show up and post a bunch of nonsense about how safe all this stuff is, shortly...


8 posted on 03/14/2011 5:33:45 PM PDT by Freddd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Christian Engineer Mass

Diablo Canyon isn’t on the San Andreas fault.


9 posted on 03/14/2011 5:33:49 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

To clarify, the first two explosions degraded the containment buildings only, their internal reactor vessels are still intact. This third blast was heard inside the reactor containment vessel and it is likely the vessel walls were degraded in some way. If so, melting uranium fuel rods would be exposed to atmosphere.


10 posted on 03/14/2011 5:34:02 PM PDT by gandalftb (Fighting jihadists is like fighting an earthquake, harden yourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

NHK reported 10,000 times more than acceptable radiation after the explosion...


11 posted on 03/14/2011 5:37:30 PM PDT by Freddd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Christian Engineer Mass
This power plant was designed to withstand a 8.0 earthquake, which it appeared to do. The problem was the tsunami swamping the diesel generators and batteries and shorting everything out.

No one thought of that.......

12 posted on 03/14/2011 5:38:00 PM PDT by gandalftb (Fighting jihadists is like fighting an earthquake, harden yourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

Reactor #3 is the one to watch.

It has Plutonium as part of its fuel source.

Plutonium is far more deadly than Uranium and takes a very long time to decay substantially.


13 posted on 03/14/2011 5:39:03 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

I read somewhere that GE produced these Japanese nuke plants.


14 posted on 03/14/2011 5:39:18 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

My question is... Is that going to leak into the ocean and radiate the Pacific Ocean and spread over the globe.. much like the tsunami waves that reached our shores? Is it going to cause Japan to be another Chernobyl type disaster? If 3-6 cores melt down isn’t that 6x’s the disaster of Chernobyl which is a no go zone for the next thousand years or so? Where do all those people go? It looks like a much bigger disaster than they are telling us. The news gets worse every day...


15 posted on 03/14/2011 5:39:24 PM PDT by BigFinn (The King is coming and He isn't riding a donkey this time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freddd

Yup, we have ships at sea, downwind. They are on the road to Chernobyl now.


16 posted on 03/14/2011 5:39:48 PM PDT by gandalftb (Fighting jihadists is like fighting an earthquake, harden yourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

you mean no one thought of a tsunami? I find that hard to believe..

no reason why those gen sets weren’t built on top of the reactor or another high place...not at ground level


17 posted on 03/14/2011 5:40:25 PM PDT by janetjanet998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DB
Yes it is.




18 posted on 03/14/2011 5:40:35 PM PDT by Christian Engineer Mass (25ish Cambridge MA grad student. Many younger conservative Christians out there? __ Click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DB

You are very correct on Plutonium. It is the most lethal substance known. Anything inhaled destroys the lungs.


19 posted on 03/14/2011 5:41:35 PM PDT by gandalftb (Fighting jihadists is like fighting an earthquake, harden yourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Freddd

I’ve been told on here that can’t happen with a LWR. I was told to ‘educate myself’ on the matter.


20 posted on 03/14/2011 5:41:46 PM PDT by Tolsti2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-210 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson