Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LostInBayport

Antarctica. A continent and buried under (frozen) water.


24 posted on 03/12/2011 4:39:04 PM PST by BipolarBob (I'm BiPolar,BiWinning AND have a clean drug test. Questions? Call 1-800-CharlieSheen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: BipolarBob

That was one of the possibilities! Ancient maps
(16th Century) even show a different coastline for it freom what we know today. It could be under there...

Another suggestion for the location of Atlantis that always intrigued me is the system of “roads” found off Bimini and Cay Sal. They are very symmetrical lines of rocks running out into the ocean.


27 posted on 03/12/2011 4:59:07 PM PST by LostInBayport (When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: BipolarBob

Antarctica. A continent and buried under (frozen) water.

for the past 14 million years ...


32 posted on 03/12/2011 5:20:09 PM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: BipolarBob; PIF
"Antarctica. A continent and buried under (frozen) water."

I used to think that too.

But under the ice, much of which goes all the way to the sea-floor, Antarctica's actual geography is less monolithic.

This article, which I find easily by searching for "if all the ice melts", is interesting in its own right, but also has a map of what Antarctica would look like "if all the ice melted".

It's smaller than Australia, with many islands and an archipelago.

49 posted on 03/12/2011 8:47:57 PM PST by NicknamedBob (I get my exercise. I take my vitamins. I tell pain it can come along, but it'll have to ride in back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: BipolarBob; LostInBayport; NicknamedBob
me, from an defunct forum:
April 25, 2000 21:15:47 EDT -- The Hapgood, Hancock, and Flem-Ath ideas about the various medieval maps of Antarctica are gently and cogently refuted by Robert Schoch in his Voices of the Rocks (p 105-106 in particular, but the entire discussion begins a few pages earlier and is well worth reading).

July 31, 2000 17:40:48 EDT -- Regarding Hapgood -- I don't accept his interpretation of the old maps. Clearly those are based on copies of ancient originals, but often do not show what he claimed. The coastlines of all the continents were different before and during the most recent global glaciation. Maps made by purported, very ancient mapmaking civilizations would not show conditions remarkably similar to those of today. Robert Schoch's explanation of the apparent ice-free Antarctica in those maps makes more sense to me despite my catastrophist orientation.

August 17, 2000 20:19:11 EDT -- One reason gradual change doesn't explain glaciation is the lack of intermediate shorelines. The low point of the sealevel is attested by the "fossil" shoreline, but no intervening higher level is found in now submerged areas. This indicates that sealevel fell too quickly -- and rose again too quickly -- to leave traces of the intermediate locations. This alone dispenses with Hapgood's 2,000 years or so of crustal displacement, but the Flem-Aths have discarded that detail in favor of a very rapid crustal displacement. The Flem-Aths are stuck, however, because of the hemispheric discrepancy which can't be explained by pole shift. Antarctica is isolated by water, but the southern hemisphere is also cooler today due to the presence of the Antarctic icecap (at least that's the conventional reason -- Milankovitch would disagree).

62 posted on 03/13/2011 9:10:28 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson