To: from occupied ga; ml/nj
There’s another angle to think about here. I’m a little disappointed this thing crashed, because if it was meant to legitimately study the effect of the sun on our climate, it could have objectively flattened the anthropogenic global warming arguments. Now, it’s business-as-usual. I bet there are some GW scientists just a little bit relieved...
19 posted on
03/04/2011 5:46:41 AM PST by
Flightdeck
(If you hear me yell "Eject, Eject, Eject!" the last two will be echos...)
To: Flightdeck
IF it was meant to legitimately study the effect of the sun on our climateWith any government agency "legitimately study" is a mighty big if. Most of them follow a political agenda to keep the money flowing.
23 posted on
03/04/2011 5:53:28 AM PST by
from occupied ga
(Your most dangerous enemy is your own government,)
To: Flightdeck
27 posted on
03/04/2011 6:00:54 AM PST by
ml/nj
To: Flightdeck
No problem, they can just continue making up their global warming data.
I do wonder however, how this impacts nasa’s mission to promote islam
28 posted on
03/04/2011 6:01:18 AM PST by
farmguy
To: Flightdeck
There’s another angle to think about here. I’m a little disappointed this thing crashed, because if it was meant to legitimately study the effect of the sun on our climate, it could have objectively flattened the anthropogenic global warming arguments. Now, it’s business-as-usual. I bet there are some GW scientists just a little bit relieved... I agree. This was legitimate science that was wrapped in the terminology of political and marketing fraud.
43 posted on
03/04/2011 6:46:55 AM PST by
Moonman62
(Half of all Americans are above average. Politicians come from the other half.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson