Personally, I think this is one we should stay out of. We’ve asked enough of our boys in actions in the Middle East. They’ll hate us no matter what we do, and we may not want to be in any way responsible for what follows Qaddafi (or however it’s spelled today).
Libya has always been a good whipping horse with little risk for doing so besides covert acts of terrorism and sabotage, which are problems for the little people and opportunities for the governing ruling elites of America and the UK.
“Personally, I think this is one we should stay out of. We’ve asked enough of our boys in actions in the Middle East. They’ll hate us no matter what we do...”
You wrote exactly what I was thinking.
Yes I agree we need our troops in our inner cities and on the border. We are not safe in our own country who gives a rat’s ass about Libya.
I agree, unless there are still Americans in harms way.If there are, then that’s why we have United States Marines.Otherwise I say leave it alone.
Why is it that the world complains because the US is a bully etc., etc.. Then the first time there is a problem they demand to know why we haven't gotten involved yet. We have troops in Iraq and fighting a vicious war in Afghanistan and now they want our Marines to die in Libya. For what? let the Libyans take care of their own problems.
Americanophile wrote:
“Personally, I think this is one we should stay out of.”
Amen.
His name is spelled: Quadaffiduk
And your opinion is spot on. Not one American life for Libya.
I agree. I do NOT want one soldier to so much as stub his toe for these people. They are part of Islam. I do NOT want one red cent spent on them. Would a single one of them lift a finger to help us in similar circumstances? Hell no. They’d pile on and start beheading us.
F’em.