Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/14/2011 2:49:50 PM PST by fightinJAG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
To: fightinJAG

WTF....Just STOP all the STUPID SPENDING NOW.


2 posted on 02/14/2011 2:52:19 PM PST by spokeshave (WTF....the only thing 0bambi's investments will get us is a bullet train to bankruptcy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fightinJAG

Please note: when I post something written by John Carney, a staffer at CNBC, some posters confuse him with JAY Carney, the new WH press secretary.

Two very different guys!

Enjoy.


3 posted on 02/14/2011 2:53:09 PM PST by fightinJAG (Americans: the only people in the world protesting AGAINST government spending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fightinJAG

Why not save all the time and Money on all this crap and just send in your Pay check and line up for the Cheese


4 posted on 02/14/2011 2:53:43 PM PST by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fightinJAG

Give me a flat tax, where everyone has ‘skin in the game’, and I’ll consider it.


5 posted on 02/14/2011 2:54:01 PM PST by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fightinJAG

Two words:

Flat. Tax.


6 posted on 02/14/2011 2:54:15 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fightinJAG
This is the first step in eliminating what many economists view as an expensive and inefficient housing subsidy.

Cool. As long as I can eliminate the expensive and inefficient subsidy I provide the county called 'property tax'.

Otherwise, the administration can shove it.

7 posted on 02/14/2011 2:54:48 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fightinJAG
Better suggestion: apply GAAP principles to the US Government's budgeting/accounting, and criminal prosecutions faced by commercial enterprises to those in DC who haven't bothered to follow them.
8 posted on 02/14/2011 2:55:25 PM PST by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fightinJAG

Canada survives without the deduction. For decades I’ve felt it needs to be eliminated. And not on the rich, but across the board. I hate this “just on the rich” nonsense.

‘Couse, if I had my way, the income tax would be the same rate for everyone, even if you made only a dollar a years. We’ll take a dime please.


9 posted on 02/14/2011 2:56:06 PM PST by RobRoy (The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fightinJAG

Carney practiced corporate law at firms such as Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom and Latham & Watkins, primarily representing banks, hedge funds and private equity firms.


12 posted on 02/14/2011 2:58:02 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fightinJAG
"...or—as I proposed this morning—allow up to $2 trillion of new tax cuts for the American people."

As if anyone here didn't know, this is the core of this idea. This is just a transfer of wealth collected from the mortgage payers, i.e., the productive people, to the indolent, i.e., Obama freeloaders. [BTW, Carney, they're not "tax cuts" if you didn't pay the tax in the first place.]

13 posted on 02/14/2011 2:58:02 PM PST by Paine in the Neck (Napolean fries the idea powder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fightinJAG
If it were eliminated, it might ... allow up to $2 trillion of new tax cuts for the American people.

Shell games don't get any more obvious than that.

14 posted on 02/14/2011 3:00:06 PM PST by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fightinJAG
The mortgage deduction is the biggest of the "social engineering through the tax code" list of deductions and credits. Dump them all and go to a flat tax or a national sales tax. (Or even a national salsa tax as my spell checker helpfully suggested when I mistyped sales).

But that's easy for me to say since it only saves me about $350 per year now.

15 posted on 02/14/2011 3:00:10 PM PST by KarlInOhio (Washington is finally rid of the Kennedies. Free at last, thank God almighty we are free at last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fightinJAG

Take away the mortgage deduction and lose the votes of the handful of productive people who still support you, idiot.

This guy seems determined to commit political suicide.


16 posted on 02/14/2011 3:01:05 PM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fightinJAG

The Wall Streeter derivatives boy who wrote this article is dishonest.

Not only will the taxpaying homeowner have to pay thousands more in taxes every year, the value of his/her home will plummet another 20% or so, wiping out a lot of equity.

You don’t abolish a tax exemption that people made a 30-year investment decision on and on which they have much if not most of their accumulated wealth.

HORRIBLE idea. Next.


17 posted on 02/14/2011 3:03:41 PM PST by LowTaxesEqualsProsperity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fightinJAG

If it were eliminated, it might bring in more than $2 trillion of new revenue for the government or—as I proposed this morning—allow up to $2 trillion of new tax cuts for the American people.

Hahahaha LOL Only a democrat could say that ending a tax, thereby increasing your taxes, could spur a big tax cut


18 posted on 02/14/2011 3:03:49 PM PST by bill1952 (Choice is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fightinJAG
Seems a lot of people don't really think too deeply about how things get the way they are.

The "mortgage deduction" is merely the only major surviving deduction of a general class that used to be across the board: deduction of interest paid from your income taxes, since someone else is going to pay interest income tax on that interest paid to them by you.

25 years ago our very own "republican" BobDole pushed through a lovely little bill that wiped out such a deduction for all other interest payments; prior to 1985, the interest paid on any loan - cars, credit cards, whatever - was deductible.

It's called the principle of no double taxation. No difficult to understand: why should the government tax the same money twice?

On the contrary, Mr. Carney. Not only should the mortgage deduction be preserved, but the same deduction for all other interest paid should be reinstated, and BobDole's name be struck from the Republican party rolls for ever.

If not, then how 'bout we cancel those taxes I gotta pay on that "interest income" stated on them 1099's?

Better yet, just kill the Marxist inspired income tax. It was never meant to do anything except collateralize the Fed anyway.

21 posted on 02/14/2011 3:07:54 PM PST by Regulator (Watch Out! Americans are on the March! America Forever, Mexico Never!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fightinJAG

Top income level my ass. They’ll have a go at all of us.

They do this and I no longer make any payments on my place. They can shove the thing right square up their asses.


24 posted on 02/14/2011 3:09:54 PM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fightinJAG
If it were eliminated, it might bring in more than $2 trillion of new revenue for the government

Incorrect assumption. The wealthy would move their holdings to corporations and then rent the property back to themselves. This would allow them to deduct the mortgage interest as an expense and then depreciate the realestate. In other words, there would be unintended consequences and the $2 trillion would not materialize.

27 posted on 02/14/2011 3:10:46 PM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fightinJAG
Why isn't the earned income tax credit on anyone's list?
28 posted on 02/14/2011 3:11:21 PM PST by Glenn (iamtheresistance.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fightinJAG
This is an incredibly bad idea.

Housing, home furnishings and home utilities, are a major section of our economy. This would be like dropping a bomb on yet another major sector of the economy.

The timing couldn't be worse. This would drive even more home buyers from the housing market making the dip even worse.

Unless you grandfather existing mortgages, it's a fundamentally unfair tax. The government provided an incentive to incur debt to buy homes, and to dramatically end that incentive after they have bought a home is just not right. The additional $2000-$4000 tax that will result on average homeowners from removing that incentive may well push even more homeowners into bankruptcy.

31 posted on 02/14/2011 3:14:46 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson