Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sigurdrifta

Exactly. I’m not even sure that’s a big deal. It probably depends on how much and what kind of stuff they have packed into it, and how big a conventional explosive they have.

Dirty bombs are not a terrorist’s weapon of choice for good reasons. It takes more money and expertise to make one. The guys who have the expertise are not going to do it, because they are smart enough to know the risks to themselves. It’s probably as likely to poison you as your intended target. You’re more likely to get caught. And even if you succeed, the destruction is not significantly more than a conventional explosive.

I remember seeing a TV interview of an anti-nuclear activist a few years ago. She was talking about how they had done a test to see if terrorists could break into a nuclear installation. The phony terrorists broke in and were there for about an hour before they got caught. She was hyperventilating as she stated that they were there long enough to make a bomb. Yes. But she did not mention that it was only a dirty bomb. She left the impression that she was talking about a nuclear explosive. Hard to see why a terrorist would add the risk of getting caught at a nuke installation to his plan when he would not be getting much more out of it than a conventional explosive.

Not to say that it could not happen, but it’s the hysteria that the terrorists are hoping for. Why give them the satisfaction when it doesn’t really merit hysteria in the first place?

Of course, a nuclear explosive is a different matter, but you can’t make a nuclear explosive from the materials you find at a nuclear power plant.


44 posted on 02/13/2011 6:21:33 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Brilliant

You seem to be minimizing the story without having any clue what they found. Why?


70 posted on 02/13/2011 7:24:23 PM PST by Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears (The "11th Commandment" applies to Republicans, not RINOs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Brilliant
Of course, a nuclear explosive is a different matter, but you can’t make a nuclear explosive from the materials you find at a nuclear power plant.

Well, technically you can, but you have to look out for the Stuxnet worm (or be prepared to make and handle UF6 for awhile).

Then again, there's always breeder reactors: but I don't recall what isotopes they produce, nor the myraid details which would be involved in fashioning a bomb from them.

Too complex to do on-site in an hour, though, which was pretty much your point.

/frantic smug hand-waving in the vain hope of sounding sophisticated and knowledgeable)

Cheers!

98 posted on 02/13/2011 10:18:19 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson