Those links were to explain what the I69 project was.
The I69 project is also known as the NAFTA Superhighway.
If he’s so dead set against NAFTA, then WHY did he earmark money for a highway that would benefit NAFTA?
Here is a link to where it’s been discussed:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1939502/posts
Note that there are other Freeper’s who stated in the above thread that he earmarked money for the project that I mentioned above.
Are they lying too?
As far as my service, all one has to do is look at my profile page.
My only regret is not staying in, but I sure as hell wasn’t going to get railroaded by the Retention NCO by going to where HE wanted me to go for my next duty station.
I took the same oath that you took, and I don’t recall anything that said that upon separation from the military that I would no longer have to honor that oath.
It is because of the oath I took that I firmly believe that ALL politicians who have been in office for two or more terms needs to be thrown out on their collective a$$es, stripped of their benefits, and barred for life from holding any elected or appointed public sector job to include lobbying..... And those are the ones who are not serving prison time for the willful destruction of our Constitution, our country, and our way of life they have caused over the years.
We might agree on this one. Though, I might add pay and benefits not to exceed median income for working class folk.
That said, I'm still not making the connection where RP was a proponent of NAFTA. I realize you have tried several times with links and etc, but it's not there.
Meanwhile, I don't doubt other freepers have discussed it. But, to my knowledge, no one proved he was a proponent of NAFTA. Not even in his earmarks.