Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ConocoPhillips, Marathon plan to close Alaska LNG plant
AP via Fuel Fix ^ | February 10, 2011 | BECKY BOHRER

Posted on 02/10/2011 6:24:44 AM PST by thackney

ConocoPhillips and Marathon Oil Corp. confirmed Wednesday that they plan to close the Kenai liquefied natural gas plant after more than 40 years in operation, citing market changes.

Dan Clark, manager of Cook Inlet assets for ConocoPhillips Alaska, told The Associated Press the company could not secure the sales and supply agreements necessary to keep the plant in operation beyond April or May.

...

Exports from the plant, located at Nikiski, began exports in 1969. Clark said all exported liquefied natural gas, or LNG, went to Japan.

At the peak, he said, about 64 billion cubic a year was exported. But volumes have been falling.

(Excerpt) Read more at fuelfix.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: energy; lng; naturalgas

1 posted on 02/10/2011 6:24:51 AM PST by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

Hard to compete with Alaska gas against the rising tide of shale gas.


2 posted on 02/10/2011 6:36:14 AM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

How about we build an LNG terminal in California and use that NG domestically? That would help offset shortages due to the bad policies in New Mexico.

LOL. Yeah, right. “It might blow up.” 40 years of safe operating experience isn’t enough for the wackos.


3 posted on 02/10/2011 6:37:11 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
What do you think about Gottstein's idears concerning gas pipeline to Fairbanks?

I know the market at present isn't there, but for the future, and something/anything to eventually solve the super high energy prices AK deals with. So many Alaskans (even conservative Alaskans) are convinced that political corruption have derailed the will of the people time and time again. Pipeline has become just like another road to Nome.

4 posted on 02/10/2011 6:41:03 AM PST by Eska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Gas to Liquid, ( GTL ) gives us a really good grade of "JP" i.e. Diesel type fuels. Convert it up in Alaska and ship via pipeline for our Airliners and the Military......

For those 2 groups to go to a domestic supply as a national goal via national security would nto be a bad thing, all we need is leadership and a national will....

5 posted on 02/10/2011 6:42:02 AM PST by taildragger ((Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

This is a very small plant and the Cook Inlet, the source of the gas for this plant is running low and fast.

LNG is not a cheap method to trasnport gas and for very small volumes it is not worth the expense to build the facility.

You need more pipelines. The lower 48 is not short on gas sources, only pipelines and permission to drill and produce.


6 posted on 02/10/2011 6:43:18 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: taildragger
Convert it up in Alaska and ship via pipeline for our Airliners and the Military

That would involve building and paying for a pipeline that will cost 10's of billions of dollars. The economics isn't there yet.

7 posted on 02/10/2011 6:48:43 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Eska
What do you think about Gottstein's idears concerning gas pipeline to Fairbanks?

I don't think the market is big enough to support the cost, yet.

However, for years they have been trucking a small amount from the Nikiski LNG plant to Fairbanks. There was talk of doing the same from the North Slope. This would be a relatively less expensive way to start building the market in Central Alaska until the demand was large enough for the pipeline.

For a low cost start, dismantle the closing Nikiski and move it to the larger source of Natural Gas on the North Slope. Update it for less cost than new, although the lower design temperature may require significant vessel replacement cost. The trucks already exist and so does the small market.

A larger gas source gives the incentive to build more users of the gas. This is probably the only economic way to get started.

8 posted on 02/10/2011 6:54:12 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Eska

More info on the existing LNG trucking at:

http://www.fngas.com/about.html


9 posted on 02/10/2011 6:55:52 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thackney

An LNG terminal was debated for Long Beach and other locations on the SoCal coast for over 10 years. It was to import (IIRC) Middle Eastern gas. The kooks wouldn’t allow it to be built and it finally faded away. If it had been built, it could have received the small amount of gas from Alaska as well as the ME.


10 posted on 02/10/2011 7:01:11 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
If it had been built, it could have received the small amount of gas from Alaska

Only after the contracts to Japan expire.

11 posted on 02/10/2011 7:05:45 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: thackney
I have been actively researching converting one or both of my cars to dual fuel; gasoline and NG.

The conversion kits are not that expensive but the tanks are and refueling stations are few and far between hence the dual fuel requirement.

What would be very helpful it to allow the many “private (aka utility)” refueling stations and government stations to service the public which would have the side benefit of offloading some of their operating costs and generating a profit center.

Given the USA has ample supplies of NG and absolutely huge potential supplies of frozen methane at an easy 300’ drilling depth the only reason, given the very shaky oil supply, I can see is the government does not want us to be energy independent regardless of what they say.

12 posted on 02/10/2011 7:09:52 AM PST by Wurlitzer (Welcome to the new USSA (United Socialist States of Amerika))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: thackney
And if the wackadoodles shut off the Straits and the Suez how does my brainstorm not become job number one? I am not trying to be a smart alack, but is it not time to come on shore if you will with all\ sources. I could see this flying before Coal to Oil via Fischer Tropsch with the eco-weenies nixing that in a heartbeat.
13 posted on 02/10/2011 7:20:47 AM PST by taildragger ((Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: taildragger
Closing the Suez adds days to the travel time of tankers, but stops no fuel. There would be a ripple in the price for weeks.

Closing the Straights of Hormuz will far greater affect others in the world than us. It would affect world prices very quickly and would not be tolerated by anyone very long, including suppliers like Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and those with a little sense in Iran.

14 posted on 02/10/2011 9:49:52 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Aw, cheese. My gas bill is already astronomical. :o(


15 posted on 02/10/2011 1:54:56 PM PST by redhead ("I think I'm the best fish filleter in the whole third grade." --Piper Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson