[HalleysFifth]

Only 139 votes cast at time of this post: Yes: 46% No: 51% Und: 3% Other 0%

[HalleysFifth]

Oops. On further examination of this poll, it seems you have to have a login account at WashingtonTimes.com to vote. Sorry.

[hosepipe]

ALL Polls are propaganda..

[Sister_T]

I voted No. These groups need to stop backing down, in the name of “principle”, and start exposing just how “conservative” homosexual so-called “rights” really are. Start showing people how much freedom of speech they will lose if groups like GOProud get what they want and show examples from places like Massachusetts and other places where people have been harassed for opposing homosexual so-called “rights”. Tell people the loss of their religious freedom if these groups get their way.

No, these groups shouldn’t boycott; they should be there in force and exposing these so-called “conservatives” and their anti-First Amendment agenda.

[NoLibZone]

Norquist,Khan and Paul will be there.

[JoeFromSidney]

I had no objection to the Pink Pistols being present at a recent Gun Rights Policy Conference. Despite their sinful behavior, they have rights too. But sponsorship is another matter. I think CPAC went too far there.

[yefragetuwrabrumuy]

I wonder how different the poll would be if its possible entries included:

Yes:, No:, Und:, Meh:, Huh?:, and Pass:.

[Secret Agent Man]

If they were smart they would. But that’s their choice. Personally I wouldn’t want to be there with that going on.

[fwdude]

Why in the world would someone voluntarily vote if they are “undecided?”

[DWar]

Accept help and votes from all. Maintain solidly conservative core positions. Allow no leadership positions to people who oppose any core belief. Allow no platform plank that waters down any core belief. Allow no speaker who holds other than core beliefs to address the convention. If they can live with being among us but not be a part of us so can we.

[SkyPilot]

I voted, but I can’t see the results of the poll on that page.