To: onyx; pissant; calcowgirl
Why Palin snubbed CPAC CPAC was under attack for the participation of gays and Muslims. A Palin appearance could have cost her $$$$$. That's really all there is to it.
Cha-ching, cha-ching, cha-ching.
186 posted on
02/05/2011 7:52:17 PM PST by
EveningStar
(Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
To: EveningStar
Wow.
You're so clever and all knowing.....
Say, aren't you the one who posted that crap from the Journolist today? I saw how well that went. Congrats.
188 posted on
02/05/2011 8:04:14 PM PST by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
To: EveningStar
CPAC was under attack for the participation of gays and Muslims. Wrong. CPAC is not Conservative in any shape or form. FACT. Who cares about Gays or Muslims? No one. Gays or Muslims won't be represented at the upcoming Republican Nomination. Gay & Muslims need to find a different party other than the Republican Party, if they are concerned over not being represented. Gays and Muslims need to move to the Democrat party and stay there. Moreover, anyone who supports the gays or muslims needs to stop posting on freerepublic.com
191 posted on
02/05/2011 8:20:06 PM PST by
train
To: EveningStar
Find a new hobby.
192 posted on
02/05/2011 8:22:45 PM PST by
onyx
(If you truly support Sarah Palin and want to be on her busy ping list, let me know!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson