To: redgolum
According to another report, the judge did not put a stay on the mandate because he said it was unnecessary, since the entire act was unconstitutional.
7 posted on
01/31/2011 1:22:42 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Cicero
>>According to another report, the judge did not put a stay on the mandate because he said it was unnecessary, since the entire act was unconstitutional.<<
That is how I see it. The ruling IS the “stay”.
11 posted on
01/31/2011 1:28:22 PM PST by
RobRoy
(The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
To: Cicero
WTF....the judge did not put a stay on the mandate because he said it was unnecessary, since the entire act was unconstitutional.
15 posted on
01/31/2011 1:32:02 PM PST by
spokeshave
(WTF....the only thing 0bambi's investments will get us is a bullet train to bankruptcy.)
To: Cicero
IMO, that should have been, or should be, the congresscritters’ next bill -
make the waivers illegal.
18 posted on
01/31/2011 1:37:26 PM PST by
MrB
(Tagline suspended for important announcement on my about page. Click my handle.)
To: Cicero
Would this also make Big Sis Janet's statements and her “ WATCH LIST “ of those who opposed the Health Care legislation before it was passed unconstitutional ? and the Federal Judge stated that they, this administration, the Democrat controlled Congress exceeded their constitutional authority ?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson