Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NYRepublican72; alancarp

Doesn’t matter. The ruling is clear, it only covers the states that have filed the injunction. They still have an effective law because between 24 to 30 states are not contesting it.

There are also several aspects of the law already in effect. This a can of worms, so don’t get your hopes up quite yet.


321 posted on 01/31/2011 2:15:12 PM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (Patriotic by Proxy! (Cause I'm a nutcase and it's someone Else's' fault!....))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies ]


To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Right. However, I should be able to go sun-tanning (in Alabama) without the 10% excise tax now!


323 posted on 01/31/2011 2:18:18 PM PST by alancarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies ]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP; All

this on Politico44

JUDGE WHO? — The White House says a ruling by a federal judge against the new health care law is an example of judicial “overreaching” and “activism.”

“This ruling is well out of the mainstream of judicial opinion,” Stephanie Cutter, an assistant to President Obama, wrote on the White House’s blog after Judge Roger Vinson in Florida ruled that the entire law is unconstitutional. “Today’s ruling ... is a plain case of judicial overreaching. The judge’s decision contradicts decades of Supreme Court precedent that support the considered judgment of the democratically elected branches of government that the Act’s ‘individual responsibility’ provision is necessary to prevent billions of dollars of cost-shifting every year by individuals without insurance who cannot pay for the health care they obtain.”

http://www.politico.com/politico44/


325 posted on 01/31/2011 2:20:27 PM PST by ColdOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies ]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP; All

this on Politico44

JUDGE WHO? — The White House says a ruling by a federal judge against the new health care law is an example of judicial “overreaching” and “activism.”

“This ruling is well out of the mainstream of judicial opinion,” Stephanie Cutter, an assistant to President Obama, wrote on the White House’s blog after Judge Roger Vinson in Florida ruled that the entire law is unconstitutional. “Today’s ruling ... is a plain case of judicial overreaching. The judge’s decision contradicts decades of Supreme Court precedent that support the considered judgment of the democratically elected branches of government that the Act’s ‘individual responsibility’ provision is necessary to prevent billions of dollars of cost-shifting every year by individuals without insurance who cannot pay for the health care they obtain.”

http://www.politico.com/politico44/


326 posted on 01/31/2011 2:20:54 PM PST by ColdOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies ]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Agreed. This is only the first step.

The 11th Circuit will probably issue a stay and hear the appeal. It’ll ultimately end up before the Supremes.


348 posted on 01/31/2011 2:49:02 PM PST by NYRepublican72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies ]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
The ruling is clear, it only covers the states that have filed the injunction.

I don't see how that's possible. Unconstitutional for one, is unconstitutional for all.

Until some higher court rules otherwise, Obamacare is null and void throughout the land.

354 posted on 01/31/2011 3:12:51 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson