To: Marty62
He ruled the whole law is unconstitutional because it does not have aseverability clause. If we get this ruiling from the Supremes it will be the best thing for this country in my whole life.
11 posted on
01/31/2011 12:10:02 PM PST by
NRG1973
To: NRG1973
I was hoping SOME judge would hold the absence of severability over the law.
I think the Va judge ruled against the individual mandate,
but stated that the rest of it could stay despite the absence of severability.
40 posted on
01/31/2011 12:14:27 PM PST by
MrB
(Tagline suspended for important announcement on my about page. Click my handle.)
To: NRG1973
Thanks for answering #20 before I was even able to post it. No implied severability just because Congress usually remembers to include that clause, as the Virginia judge ruled last year.
43 posted on
01/31/2011 12:14:36 PM PST by
KarlInOhio
(Washington is finally rid of the Kennedies. Free at last, thank God almighty we are free at last.)
To: NRG1973
Yeeeeeeehawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson