Posted on 01/25/2011 7:30:08 PM PST by Texas Fossil
It could be a game-changer.
A plan in Arizona to require presidential candidates to prove their eligibility to occupy the Oval Office is approaching critical mass, even though it has just been introduced.
The proposal from state Rep. Judy Burges, who carried a similar plan that fell short last year only because of political maneuvering, was introduced yesterday with 16 members of the state Senate as co-sponsors.
It needs only 16 votes in the Senate to pass.
In the House, there are 25 co-sponsors, with the need for only 31 votes for passage, and Burges told WND that there were several chamber members who confirmed they support the plan and will vote for it, but simply didn't wish to be listed as co-sponsors.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Yeah, but don't you then spit it out? LOL
“B. The affidavit prescribed in subsection A shall include references to and attachment of all of the following, which shall be sworn to under penalty of perjury:
1. An original long form birth certificate that includes the date and place of birth, the names of the hospital and the attending physician and signatures of the witnesses in attendance.
2. A sworn statement attesting that the candidate has not held dual or multiple citizenship and that the candidate’s allegiance is solely to the United States of America.
3. A sworn statement or form that identifies the candidate’s places of residence in the United States for the preceding fourteen years.
C. If both the candidate and the national political party committee for that candidate fail to submit and swear to the documents prescribed in this section, the secretary of state shall not place that presidential candidate’s name on the ballot in this state. “
Does anyone know if long form birth certificates are available from all states? I was born in Duluth, Minnesota, but all I have is the certificate they send if you ask - and it is NOT a long form.
The point to remember is that he could well have been born in Kenya and his grandmother, Madelyn Dunham, could have forged his mother’s name on a non-hospital birth certificate and filed it, making the Illegal a magic American. That’s true because, then and now, HI law allows either parent of a child that’s not born in a bithing center simply to obtain a Certificate of Live Birth form, fill it out, and have it be as valid as a properly completed hospital Certificate of Live Birth. If his BC were such a forgery, as I believe it was, that would also explain the allegedly contemporaneous birth announcements that were published in the major HI newspapers, since, based on the fraudulent BC, the HI Department of Health would have simply and duly forwarded his name to the papers for publication.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.