Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

No fan of Rahm, but this is a terrible ruling and smacks of “Chicago Machine” politics. He was a Chicago congressman, he went to work in the White House - even keeping his Chicago house, and then he comes back and isn’t a resident?

This isn;t a carbetbagger story, this is a Chicago guy who’s being prevented from running because he would win.


12 posted on 01/24/2011 10:37:13 AM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: babble-on

You haven’t read the Opinion, have you?


20 posted on 01/24/2011 10:40:54 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: babble-on

Not true-they are using the same ruling MI is, in keeping me from claiming residency even though I own two houses there. I haven’t lived there for 5 years. 2 years ago a County Treasurer found out i was renting the homes and denied my Homestead Exemption, even though a friend is renting one of the houses and I am back there frequently.


25 posted on 01/24/2011 10:42:42 AM PST by BOBTHENAILER (EPA will ruin your life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: babble-on

This just means other miserable Rat will take the mayorship, so no big difference.


30 posted on 01/24/2011 10:50:21 AM PST by eater-of-toast ("It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones." -- Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: babble-on

Um the law clearly states that you must be a resident of the city 1 full year before the election.

Maybe you didn’t know Rahm was living in DC. And working for Obama. In fact he amended his tax returns when he decided to run for Mayor to state that he was a fulltime resident of the city.

This court actually read the letter of the law and applied it.


35 posted on 01/24/2011 10:54:32 AM PST by JRochelle (My predictions on 2/3/2010: It will be Thune/Rubio in '12.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: babble-on

I tend to agree with you. It’s not like the guy just showed up from Arkansas or something and never had anything to do with Chicago before.


44 posted on 01/24/2011 11:00:46 AM PST by Ditto (Nov 2, 2010 -- Partial cleaning accomplished. More trash to remove in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: babble-on; flaglady47; hoosiermama; Chigirl 26; prairiebreeze; Bushbacker1; Eden Scout; ...
All the dummy had to do was buy a cheap condo in Chicago and live there a weekend or two every once in a while over the two year span.

He had access to the finest lawyers, but he never did that. Leading me to believe that Obama directed him to run for mayor at a much later date. Rahm was caught flatfooted with no residence he'd actually lived in.

He's doing the best he can to wiggle around the law, but so far, no dice.

The higher courts in Illinois are not controlled by Cook County or the City of Chicago. Their gaggle of judges/justices are comprised of many from the conservative counties around the state.

Leni

53 posted on 01/24/2011 11:14:39 AM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: babble-on
No fan of Rahm, but this is a terrible ruling and smacks of “Chicago Machine” politics. He was a Chicago congressman, he went to work in the White House - even keeping his Chicago house, and then he comes back and isn’t a resident?

They didn't say he wasn't a resident, in fact they said he was a resident for voting purposes. They also said he did not reside there for one year, a requirement for candidates separate and different than the residency requirements for voting.

71 posted on 01/24/2011 11:36:24 AM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson