Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: poindexters brother

Frankly, either the lets-rehabilitate-Hillary plan or the Abercrombie-protects-himself-from-donor-fraud-charges theories seem to me more plausible scenarios than the lets-rope-a-dope-a-few-birthers theory (the BC is not the only path to ineligibility). The dynamics aren’t right for the rope-a-dope. No pol, least of all a narcissistic pol with tyrannical inclinations, is going to allow pervasive doubt to erode his popularity and therefore detract from his power for years at a time, on a gambit that if reversed at just the right moment, he might get it all back on a single play. The damage can’t be reversed quickly enough, and the authenticity of any document produced will be immediately subjected to a firestorm of doubt as a probable fake due to the delay and the motivation to falsify, making the timing of a reversal of public sentiment even more unpredictable. No, I think the rope-a-dope theory could easily be a meme designed to prevent, right now, the ratcheting up of interest in the one thing that could quickly and permanently disable this presidency.


41 posted on 01/21/2011 4:00:35 PM PST by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Springfield Reformer

“Abercrombie-protects-himself-from-donor-fraud-charges theories”

I agree with your whole post but I’m leaning towars Abercommie protecting himself.

Nobody spends millions of dollars protecting a legitimate document or sends a LTC to prison for a joke.


44 posted on 01/21/2011 4:04:42 PM PST by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Springfield Reformer

The Democrats and Obama are not going to get by with continuing the game of hide the historical documents. Everyone knows that the Rinos lost control over the GOP with the Tea Party at the local, State and Federal levels.

If the Dems are really sure that they have been committing fraud, they are going to want it settled a year before the next election and Obama replaced by Hillary or someone else. In my opinion, Abercrombie just let Obama and donars know about the problem and the DNC’s determination to stop the ruse of re-election fraud by Obama.

Obama, on the other hand, I think, plans to continue the re-election ruse to shake down as much money as he can from donars between now and when his poor health indicates he needs to bow out of a second term. He can use this money to be a player when he gets out of office. Dems want that money going into DNC election coffers.

Obama’s interest conflicts with the interests of the DNC who wants donar money going to the candidate they plan to run in the election. Obama announced his goal of raising a billion dollars for his re-election a few weeks ago... The DNC, through Abercrombie, is warning Obama and donars of the constitutoinal problem. They don’t want to totally expose the constitutional problem, however, and cause a constitutional crisis while the Kenyan is in office.

For the DNC and Rinos the ideal would be for Obama to gracefully bow out of a re-election bid at the right time and forego a lot of fraudulent fund raising before a conservative legal confrontation happens that exposes the fraud.

Neither party wants to deal with Obama causing a constitutional crisis nor do they want to risk crimes of their own fraud being exposed. The Tea Party has made a mess of this “bi-partisan” fraud against the American people and Nation. These politicans all told themselves they were above the constitution.


77 posted on 01/22/2011 7:21:40 AM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson