Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MS.BEHAVIN
When I first saw "Lolita" in 1964 as the late night movie on TV, I was horrified at the whole idea. Then I read Nabokov's book and came to understand the mind of the men who chase underage "nymphets". The second time I saw the movie, I understood how it was intended to be a kind of twisted black comedy.

The recent cable version with Jeremy Irons was closer to the book, but lacked the humor that Stanley Kubrick injected into the movie. Maybe it's because James Mason portrays a more sympathetic character than Irons.

259 posted on 01/19/2011 7:58:29 PM PST by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]


To: All
"Believe it or not, George isn't at home"

z

261 posted on 01/19/2011 8:02:02 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]

To: Publius

I can’t see James Mason in anything since Lolita without getting the creeps.


269 posted on 01/19/2011 8:06:51 PM PST by TASMANIANRED (Liberals are educated above their level of intelligence.. Thanks Sr. Angelica)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]

To: Publius

I only played it because I thought you’d enjoy Nelson Riddle!
Honest!
LOL


273 posted on 01/19/2011 8:09:04 PM PST by MS.BEHAVIN (Women who behave rarely make history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson