Posted on 01/19/2011 1:12:32 PM PST by DrewsMum
Text of H.R. 299: To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education...
(Excerpt) Read more at govtrack.us ...
I wish they’d write the damn bills so you can understand what the heck they’re saying. Legal mumbo-jumbo!
that’s why I solicited freeper help. It should be a RULE that the bills should be understandable
done did. ;0)
Woohoo!!!!!!!!!! God bless the conservatives in Congress!
I don't know why, but among the rats she is especially irksome.
I wouldn't get too excited yet; you have to know that the replacement could be as bad or worse than the Original Obamacare. Republicans could just be "fulfilling their mandate to repeal Obamacare", while simply substituting another form of Socialized Medicine in its place.
Looks good. I am looking for TORT reform but so far so good.
I know why. She is a liar and beyond obnoxious.
The link here IS the new replacement bill
QUESTION!
If 26 States [a majority of the States] have officially declared Obamacare to be unconstitutional and have rejected it, which they have, see: Six more states have joined Florida's lawsuit against President Obama's landmark healthcare law, arguing the controversial measure is unconstitutional., and the overwhelming number of Americans reject Obamacare as written, which is also the case, see 75% Want Health Care Law Changed, and our Constitution requires the approval of “the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof ” prior to the exercise of any new power by Congress, how can one contend the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,” signed by President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010 is constitutional when the American people have never debated and then granted a power to Congress to regulate the American People’s health care needs and choices as required under Article Five of our Constitution?
By the above stated facts, Obama‘s “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” cannot at this time obtain the consent of the governed (the required number of States) for it to be within the four walls of our Constitution.
Where have I gone wrong especially when our Constitution declares:
“The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”
And
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States, respectively, or to the people.”
JWK
Health care by consent of the governed (Article 5) our amendment process --- tyranny by a PROGRESSIVE majority vote in Congress! .
I started to get a headache while viewing the proposed bill.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Rat-Fl-20) is speaking now. Another anecdote of death and destruction if Obamacare is repealed.
I don’t know why, but among the rats she is especially irksome.
—
agreed. maniacally driven almost.. Pelosi Jr.
Is that the counter top model made by Ronco? I got one for Christmas. I love mine. It repeals, it replaces, it slices, it dices. It also makes julienne fries.
LOL....no need to make fun....
So the Republicans now want their OWN unconstitutional national health care bill?
What happened to repealing Obamacare and rolling back the government interference in health care that LED to the “crisis” government felt obligated to fix with more government?
So this new bill is no good?
Thanks....I will spend the next two days trying to see what they’re pulling here......
Paul Broun is a doc. I trained with him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
