Posted on 01/13/2011 8:27:34 AM PST by IMissPresidentReagan
AND NOW . . . amidst billowing clouds of fragrant, aromatic first- and second-hand premium cigar smoke. . . it is time for . . . that harmless, lovable little fuzz ball, the highly-trained broadcast specialist, having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have, from behind the golden EIB microphone, firmly ensconced in the prestigious Attila-the-Hun chair at the Limbaugh Institute of Advanced Conservative Studies, serving humanity simply by showing up, and hes not retiring until every American agrees with him, do NOT doubt him, with shrieks of joy at the mere mention of his name (thats Rush, for those in Rio Linda),the Mandarin of Talk Radio, with talent on loan from G-d, at the cutting-edge of societal evolution, with half his brain tied behind his back just to make it fair, the all-knowing, all-caring, all-sensing, all-feeling, all-concerned Maha-Rushie! Americas anchorman, truth detector, and doctor of democracy. A Real Man, a living legend, a way of life. Commander in Chief of U.S. Operation Chaos. Chief Waga-Waga El Rushbo of the El Conservo Tribe. Chief of the Patriotism Police. Leader of the Conservative Movement. A Weapon of Mass Instruction. El Rushbo (a little Spanish lingo, there). He is the man who is running America (you know it and I know it). He knows the Democrats like every square inch of his glorious naked body. He is ready to do what he was born to dothats host. Get ready to what you were born to dothats listen (and post your comments on the Rush Limbaugh LIVE Radio Thread).
Sounds just like an Eric Cartman scheme from "South Park."
Falsely accusing the Tea Party of murder The front page of todays Times (London) has a photo of a peace activist in Tucson with a placard saying Hate Speech = Murder. Gary Younge in the UK Guardian articulated an argument that was rapidly spreading in liberal circles: True, the rampage apparently emerged from his confused, unstable and troubled mind. But it was also the byproduct of a polarised political culture underpinned by increasingly vitriolic, violent and vituperative rhetoric and symbolism . The connection between this rhetoric and Saturdays events are not causal but contextual. The shooter was not likely to be acting under direct instructions but in an atmosphere that made such an attack more likely rather than less.
We see this same formulation repeated over and over: Yes, Loughner may be a deranged individual, but the Tea Partys violent rhetoric is still to blame. Rather than prove causality or influence, this liberal argument posits that such evidence is not necessary, because the danger is inherent in the context or the atmosphere itself. This approach is even worse than traditional effects theory, which at least has attempted to demonstrate a connection, however dubious, between media and actions. Now, the liberal argument presents a nebulous concept of atmosphere with no links between groups or individuals and the sentiments that are assumed to prevail in politics. From this perspective, words somehow create a febrile, unpredictable ambience out of which strange events might mysteriously emerge.
Before Saturdays assassination attempt on Giffords, the predominant liberal view tagged Tea Party members as gun-toting racists or lunatics. Media reports of Tea Partiers carrying guns or a sole person shouting a racial epithet were claimed to represent the entire movement. In April, former president Bill Clinton indicated that he thought anti-government protesters like the Tea Party were potentially violent. He used the anniversary of the Oklahoma City bombing to warn that Tea Party-style rhetoric could encourage a repeat.
Essentially, the liberal response to Loughners shooting spree was to force-fit it into this pre-existing narrative even if the facts did not support it. Thats why Moulitsas could, without any evidence, quickly conclude Mission Accomplished, Sarah Palin.
Their calls to silence the Tea Party are anti-democratic. The use of inflammatory language including military imagery - is not only a long-standing practice used by all parties, but a right that should be defended. The current discussion of the Tea Party erroneously conflates extremism, anti-government sentiment and political passion with mindless acts of violence.
Unconfident of winning political debate and fearful of the distant masses, liberal elites are trying to use the Tucson shooting to defeat their opponents with smears rather than intellectual arguments. You dont have to agree with the Tea Party (and I dont) to see that it is important to oppose these false accusations of murder. http://americansituation.com/2011/01/10/falsely-accusing-tea-party-murder/
War Eagle!
Oh good grief.
Separated at birth.
Did you really call Chris Plante with the “Shameless” story? I missed it! Just Damm! What did Chris say?
He fed the crowd with loaves and fishes too!
Of course Gifford’s doctor would add ‘voluntarily’ to the eye openning story. He still wants to be a MediCare provider.
The four female Congress peeps? Almost biblical. Did barky roll back a stone when he arrived?
Yeah, Bush’s fault!
Heal this MOFO. Where the heck were you during 2001-2009 jerk?
He said something like he’d have to check that out.
I sent them the links.
That’s what I want to know — who paid for the t-shirts
Bravo, HC, bravo!
And I've got another question: Thousands of Americans are murdered every year. Why don't the families and friends of those folks rate a national memorial service?
Hi.
Just called Mrs S, she heard you! She was laughing because you wouldn’t give in when Chris said it was his best speech AND you made the same point Rush did that 0bamadinejad didn’t name names who wasn’t responsible. LOL!
Hi! FWIW, I found last night’s occasion, I won’t call it a service, really skeevy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.