There is no regulation to cover what you call that statement. The game officers have the discretion to decide wheteher a dog is chasing a dear or a moose,which are all over the place here.
They deem thenall to be doing so.What do you think the offiv=cers would do, watch a dog until it sees and chases a moose?Nope, Thats not the way it works homey.It works just as I reported.
And whats more, they will write a citation up and hold it after they warn a dog owner the first time and hang on to it.Then when they do have to shoot the dog, they fine them for the first time they caught the dog and took it back to the owner if the owner gets lippy. I would say several of you on this thread would be having dead dogs and getting fined too. I would be sitting back laughing and saying . “ Told yah!”
Some of you are just the same as the dreamy hippies who move here with their dogs and cats, letting them run loose.The dogs get shot by wardens within a month or so and the cats?Well the racoons and fox get them because they let the cats out free at night. Its really quite a laugh. I had a neighbor who went through a half dozen cats, letting them out at night...You could here their yowls and gurgles as the fox or racoon was stangling them for dinner. Its a shame the animals have to suffer because of negligent owners.
Yes there is, right here. You posted it your very self. Don't you even remember your own posts? Geesh. A state game warden, deputy warden, sheriff, deputy sheriff, constable, police officer or state police may kill by shooting with firearms, dogs, whether licensed or unlicensed, when in such close pursuit as to endanger the life of a deer or moose or found in the act of wounding, maiming or killing deer or moose.
Clear as day. Like I said, just admit you were wrong (or that your GWs are lawbreakers) and stop digging.