When you see that time line above, keep in mind some things like they “found” his cell phone at his neighbors home with smoke bombs on Dec 28. If you think that’s far-fetched, then we’re also expected to believe he didn’t notice his cell phone was missing Dec 28, Dec 29, Dec 30, & Dec 31 (he was found dead Dec 31).
We’re expected to believe he dropped his cell phone at his neighbor’s home where he was “planting smoke bombs” and for FOUR DAYS it didn’t occur to him that he dropped it there and it could incriminate him in the “smoke bomb plan”. Oh, and he just walked around for FOUR DAYS afterwards without his cell phone. Yeah, right. And let’s talk about the “smoke bombs” for a second: I never heard of someone EVER planting “smoke bombs” under someone’s house and what would that accomplish anyway?
The “news” is saying that like we all have “planted smoke bombs” under neighbors houses...you know what they mean. I never heard of that in my life! And they’re saying it “in passing”. Did the smoke bombs go off? I guess if smoke bombs went off under a home being built, that’s enough for the builders not to build that house! wtf?
Also, keep in mind the video the police/AP released to the public is obviously NOT from the security camera, but is someone FILMING the security camera. Wait, there’s more: if you look at the time line above, Wheeler was robbed, let go, then killed, and now they’re saying police found work boot footprints in his home. So we’re also expected to believe (I’m just writing what they’re telling us) that some robbers robbed him, let him go, the same or different robbers killed him, then the same or different robbers broke into his home and were walking around. Now this makes sense if the robbers were the same guys in all 3 instances. If they were different, it’s too hard to believe 1 group robbed him, and unconnected 2nd group killed him, and a 3rd yet again unconnected group broke into his home. Is there anything else “nuts” we’re expected to believe? All you have to do is wait for the “real media” reports to come out.
Written at the Examiner link as well from this morning.
It is possible he returned to the house on the 29th—change of clothes—and was returning again on the 30th when he was spotted by the original perp(s). They may have thought he was dead if they knocked him unconscious on the evening of the 28th. Knowing that he recognized them, they killed him on the 30th.
My question is who pointed the finger at him re the “bombs” on the evening of the 28th. 11:00 at night he didn't/couldn't respond. From my understanding they were rodent bombs. Here you must take a class and be certified to buy. Doubt that Jack had done that, but farmers and contractors do. So who pointed the finger at Jack? Who set him up?
You realize that they were incendiary devices that scorched the wood? They are composed of potassium nitrate, sulfur, and carbon. Recognize those?