Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Homer_J_Simpson
.Why is it so widely accepted that decreasing the marginal tax rate on individual tax-payers automatically results in decreased tax revenue for government? If we accept that premise we have already half lost the argument on taxation.

"Marginal tax rate" and "tax revenue" are expressions we need to use every time until everyong knows what they mean. Politicians and pundits like to say tax hikes when they are talking about rate hikes. Even if they aren't confused, they want voters to be confused. It's our job to get the point across. Most talk radio people hate numbers themselves. Maybe we'll even teach them.

30 posted on 01/07/2011 12:55:34 PM PST by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Freee-dame; All
Remember Bill Clinton hiking taxes to their highest rate in history and selling it to a credulous public as a tax decrease?? While at the same time insisting that forcing banks to give credit to people who didn't have the income to pay it back was...what was it supposed to be, FAIR?? And campaigning for and forcing through PNTR with China, and that whole thing with India would CREATE jobs HERE?
46 posted on 01/07/2011 1:07:24 PM PST by cake_crumb (Why do they call them "pat downs" when they're obviously "feel ups"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson