Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Horse Slaughter Is Reconsidered
The Wall Street Journal ^ | JANUARY 5, 2011 | By STEPHANIE SIMON

Posted on 01/05/2011 8:06:31 AM PST by 1rudeboy

Animal-Welfare Groups Are Joining Ranchers in a Push to Revive an Industry That Died in 2007

Less than four years after the last equine slaughterhouses in the U.S. closed down, an unlikely coalition of ranchers, horse owners and animal-welfare groups is trying to bring them back.

The group, gathering in Las Vegas this week for a conference called Summit of the Horse, aims to map out a strategy for reviving an industry that slaughtered as many as 100,000 horses a year in the U.S. before it was effectively shut down by congressional action in 2007.

Advocates say the slaughterhouses could bring an economic boost to rural areas and give owners who no longer have the means or inclination to care for the horses an economical and humane way to dispose of them.

"We believe that humane processing is absolutely a moral and an ethical choice," said Sue Wallis, a Wyoming state lawmaker who organized the event.

Ms. Wallis is working on bringing a slaughterhouse to her state, but said her coalition first must overcome what she called "the 'ick' factor."

Indeed, animal-welfare activists opposed to the resumption of slaughter say the public will rally to stop it, since many Americans grew up with such books as "Black Beauty" and TV shows like "Mister Ed" and consider horses companions, not meals.

"Public opinion is with us," said Patti Klein Manke, executive director of the Hooved Animal Humane Society.

Pressure from animal-rights groups and from undercover videos that circulated on the Internet and showed apparent cruelties in the horse-butchering process prompted Congress to shut off all funds for inspecting equine slaughterhouses in 2007. That dealt the industry a fatal blow, as federal inspections were required by law before the meat could be exported for human consumption.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: horse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: 1rudeboy

I love how they stopped the slaughterhouses. They didn’t ban the slaughter. They simply stopped paying for inspections. No government inspections meant no way of getting your process inspected, and the law required inspections so they shut you down.

Imagine that. Obama could shut down any industry he wanted this way, simply be cutting off funds to the inspectors. Did the chicken farmers support republicans in the last election? Well, cut off the funds for chicken inspections, and the chicken farmers are history.


41 posted on 01/05/2011 8:53:25 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Having Tourette's Syndrome, you knee-jerk made the implication that I was advocating cruelty and that livestock should be treated with "dignity."

In that case, you misread my comment #7. But, if you can't handle a little rudeness after being rude to me first, perhaps you should stick to fashion and interior-design threads.

42 posted on 01/05/2011 8:54:39 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Whatever, Skippy.


43 posted on 01/05/2011 8:56:29 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (DEFCON I ALERT: The federal cancer has metastasized. All personnel report to their battle stations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Was “conversely” too big of a word for you? You do understand it means, “if this is true, then this is true,” right?


44 posted on 01/05/2011 8:59:10 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: lone star annie

Oxen, which are steered Bovine, have also plowed our fields and served us in battle and are still beasts of burden. We all know their fate.
I blame Walt Disney for the “humanization” of animals


45 posted on 01/05/2011 9:01:02 AM PST by hoskinsr3106
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Robbin; 1rudeboy

I don’t know how we went from “treating animals like humans” to “treating them with dignity”.

Not that I think dignity is the right word to use either, but you can treat an animal with “dignity”, without pretending they are humans.

Oddly, a better term might be “humanely”. But the argument against slaughterhouses wasn’t just about inhumane treatment, it was about the idea of killing horses and then using the meat as food.

What you do with the remains has nothing to do with “humane” treatment (which is why it’s a better word than “with dignity” — which could imply that they deserve some special attention after death; we would say “treat the remains with dignity” if we were talking about human remains, but who cares what you do with a dead animal, within reason? It’s dead, it doesn’t have a soul, it’s relatives and family could care less what you do.

So kill the horses humanely, and then do what you want with the remains. That’s a more reasonable approach than shutting down the processing. Horses still have some uses, but the time when they were all virtually more valuable alive than as food is gone, at least in this country, where we have cars.


46 posted on 01/05/2011 9:02:26 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: lone star annie

I disagree. Horses as a “race” don’t “deserve” anything. They are animals, for our use. If they were treated humanely when they did our work for us, that was what is required, and then when they are not useful for that, they should be put to good alternate uses.

You say they should be put to sleep. Once they are killed, there is no reason to care what we do with the dead bodies. If an owner wants to pretend more for their animal, and wants to bury the beast, or cremate them, and give them a funeral, it’s their business, but if they want to sell the carcass and make some money, there’s nothing wrong with that.


47 posted on 01/05/2011 9:06:07 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: I still care

“I remember when Fernando, the horse that won the Derby, was slaughtered in a horsemeat slaughterhouse. I don’t think it was the US, but I remember being disturbed by it, on a purely emotional level. I had watched the Derby he won.”

Fernando was slaughered and eaten in Japan. They made sashimi out of him. What a shame.


48 posted on 01/05/2011 9:18:21 AM PST by forgotten man (forgotten man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lone star annie
I am against horse slaughter for humane reasons. ... there should be places where they can take their horses to put them to sleep

Umm, dude, hate to break this to you.

But "putting to sleep" is just another way of saying "slaughter."

Admittedly doesn't sound as harsh, but the result is the same.

If you have a vet put a horse to sleep, disposing of the carcass is not like burying a kitten. Eating it seems a good deal more "conservative" in the literal sense of the term than burying it. Where worms and bacteria eat it anyway.

49 posted on 01/05/2011 9:28:42 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
There was a movie done recently on the life of Temple Grandin, an autistic woman who was responsible for revolutionizing slaughter pens for cattle. Before she began to do her work, the cattle were just shoved, pushed, prodded any old way. What difference did it make, they were being turned into prime rib.

She learned how cattle move as a herd, etc. and how to get them into the kill house without terrifying them. Her methods were actually better because the cattle moved forward, peacefully.

When asked why she spent so much time and energy on it, her reply was: We are asking the cattle to give up their lives. There is no reason why they have to spend their last few hours terrified. If we can spare them that, it's the least we can do. (paraphrased)

I lived 4 months if Far East country that treated its animals like (I can't even find the word to describe it). Here's an example: I went to the store and saw a group of young men "playing" with a puppy. When I returned 20 minutes later, the puppy was dead and the young men were having themselves quite a celebratory laugh.

The cruelty with which that country treated their animals also showed up in the way they treated their wives, daughters, sons, etc.

Treat even those animals destined for death and "food" with humanely as you said. I truly believe its the least we can do.

50 posted on 01/05/2011 9:33:31 AM PST by carton253
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
You don't even have to truck your horse to a state park, you can simply drop him off on someone else's property. I've heard stories of people waking-up and finding horses in previously empty stalls.

Living behind a locked gate now,because of this threat.

We had to get the dept.of agriculture involved here to be able to sell two horse that were left here, had to feed them for over three weeks before we could sell them. Didn't come close to covering the cost of boarding (pasture)them.

51 posted on 01/05/2011 9:48:54 AM PST by piroque (it is better to perish than to live as slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

The horse population is a big problem out west. My daughter rides every week at a rescue ranch that is over capacity now. All of the rescue horses I’ve seen are vibrant, young, beautiful, horses that run and jump with the best. In the past four months I have been offered two horses at basically zero cost so long as I maintain the board and Vet care. Unfortunately I can’t swing that expense. I do think the slaughter house serves a need, I just wish we could get horse buyers and horse sellers together before the animal neglect starts which many times leads to no other option but the slaughter house.


52 posted on 01/05/2011 10:00:03 AM PST by DenverCossack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

I know of a lady who went riding in the summer in the Sierra Nevada foothills.

She came back to her truck ^ trailer to find 2 horses tied to her trailer & no other information.


53 posted on 01/05/2011 10:26:24 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Thanks.


54 posted on 01/05/2011 10:27:15 AM PST by I still care (I miss my friends, bagels, and the NYC skyline - but not the taxes. I love the South.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Another disastrous piece of legislation that has resulted in starving horses and the collapse of the commercial horse market.


55 posted on 01/05/2011 10:28:46 AM PST by Neoliberalnot ((Read "The Grey Book" for an alternative to corruption in DC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carton253

I loved that movie, seen it several times, and now we own it.

She treated the animals humanely, but saw no problem with the idea of them being killed and eaten, just that we should do it without any unncessary cruelty. AND of course, she showed how doing it nicely was actually economically sound as well.


56 posted on 01/05/2011 10:33:45 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Horse Slaughter Is Reconsidered

Am I still on the Pelosi thread?

57 posted on 01/05/2011 10:37:30 AM PST by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

It was a great movie.


58 posted on 01/05/2011 10:54:59 AM PST by carton253
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: I still care

That was in Japan


59 posted on 01/05/2011 11:22:07 AM PST by packrat35 (America is rapidly becoming a police state that East Germany could be proud of!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Just highlighting the word.

Sorry, if you’re looking to pick a fight, I’m not interested.

Good bye and good luck!


60 posted on 01/05/2011 11:28:54 AM PST by airborne (Why is it we won't allow the Bible in school, but we will in prison? Think about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson