I’m more concerned about the fact Sarah has not (to my knowledge anyway) explained her approval of artificial birth control, as to if she is referring to the birth control pill or condoms or whatever. Because the bc pill is an abortifacient, and you can’t run a pro-life campaign if you’re also pro-birth control pill. If she came out against artificial birth control, and if she went back to her baptismal faith, I’d jump through hoops of fire for her, but as it stands, she’s not solid enough of a pro-lifer for me, thus not holy enough to topple Obama and his dark administration. It was the birth control pill that started all this horrible mess we’re in today with countless dead babies daily, and severely wounded mothers.
Apparently you haven't voted for a President, in your lifetime...
Don’t expect perfect from any human (myself included).
Pray, and do as God leads you. If there is someone more faithful to principle that you should be supporting, then thats what you have to do.
For me, imperfect though she is, I believe God has his hand on her. How that all unfolds remains to be seen.
And your candidate is who?
wow....I admit...first I’ve heard this reason not to vote for a candidate. How will you ever be able to vote?
PUH-LEEZ! Sarah must keep her personal beliefs about things like birth control OUT of her campaign entirely. Do not even think for a second about having control over America's bedroom behavior as part of her campaign. RIDICULOUS. It's a free country and birth control is legal.
Everyone knows she is against abortion, but she will probably have to say that she is not interested in people's behavior within the law. If they ask her about Roe v. Wade to provoke the libs, she should say that it's definitely a bad constitutional law (taking away states' powers) but leave it at that. This is NOT a presidential issue. George Bush was pro-life and she can be too. The less said, the better.