From LA Times aeticle:
Although Abercrombie’s goal may be to support Obama, experts who study political extremism say the release of additional evidence would only perpetuate the conspiracy theory. They say people who embrace such theories are guided by suspicion and, therefore, view any contrary evidence as part of the conspiracy.
...and that might be because once you have told a lie, or presented a forgery, no one trusts you a second time.
That was a knee-slapper!
Experts in fraud (that would be me) say Obama’s failure to sign a release of his HI vital records even to keep LTC Lakin out of jail is a giant red flag for fraud and usurpation in this case.
Observing that Obama has failed to release what should be exculpatory records (records that would get him off the hook if they contain what he claims they contain) is not belief in a conspiracy theory, it is simple observation of Obama’s self-incriminating behavior.
“My thought is, ‘Rather than get into some kind of argument or play into that mentality, why not just simply try to authenticate this and let the facts speak for themselves?’ ”
Are the SPs and anti-birthers reading this? This is not Lingle, the waffling former HI governor. This is the current HI governor who says he was “there” in HI in 1961, but yet still says “why not just simply try to authenticate this” BC meaning clearly that Obama’s HI BC was _not_ fully authenticated by Linge, Fukino and the 2007 COLB.
BTW, Huffpo’s are going nuts over this and begging Abercrombie not to play into the “birther” (non) conspiracy theories. They are begging Abercrombie and the NYT to ignore the story or go back to the prior COLB talking points (won't work now that it has been proved you can get a long form). There are lots of search hits on this NY Times piece and the LAT piece as other media outlets pick up and disseminate the story. It is going viral.