Does anyone know if their is a withdrawal clause in this treaty?
Yes, Russia has specifically threatened to use the withdrawal clause if the US does missile defense. Russian statement:
“The Treaty between the Russian Federation and the United States of America on the Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms signed in Prague on April 8, 2010, can operate and be viable only if the United States of America refrains from developing its missile defence capabilities quantitatively or qualitatively.
Consequently, the exceptional circumstances referred to in Article 14 of the Treaty include increasing the capabilities of the United States of Americas missile defence system in such a way that threatens the potential of the strategic nuclear forces of the Russian Federation.
Statement by the Russian Federation on Missile Defence April 8, 2010
"The Treaty between the Russian Federation and the United States of America on the Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms signed in Prague on April 8, 2010, can operate and be viable only if the United States of America refrains from developing its missile defence capabilities quantitatively or qualitatively.
Consequently, the exceptional circumstances referred to in Article 14 of the Treaty include increasing the capabilities of the United States of Americas missile defence system in such a way that threatens the potential of the strategic nuclear forces of the Russian Federation.
At the signing ceremony, President Obama stated:
President Medvedev and I have also agreed to expand our discussions on missile defense. This will include regular exchanges of information about our threat assessments, as well as the completion of a joint assessment of emerging ballistic missiles. And as these assessments are completed, I look forward to launching a serious dialogue about Russian-American cooperation on missile defense.
Note Article V # 3
"Each Party shall not convert and shall not use ICBM launchers and SLBM launchers for placement of missile defense interceptors therein. Each Party further shall not convert and shall not use launchers of missile defense interceptors for placement of ICBMs and SLBMs therein."
I have read that we don't need ICBM/SLBM launchers anymore for defense interceptors and apparently this issue was briefed to the Senators in a classified briefing and this is why they voted for this damn treaty. I'm still troubled also by Article XI11 - Who knows the truth here except the lying politicians?