Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: old republic

Yes, Russia has specifically threatened to use the withdrawal clause if the US does missile defense. Russian statement:

“The Treaty between the Russian Federation and the United States of America on the Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms signed in Prague on April 8, 2010, can operate and be viable only if the United States of America refrains from developing its missile defence capabilities quantitatively or qualitatively.

Consequently, the exceptional circumstances referred to in Article 14 of the Treaty include increasing the capabilities of the United States of America’s missile defence system in such a way that threatens the potential of the strategic nuclear forces of the Russian Federation.”


84 posted on 12/22/2010 2:52:22 PM PST by Dave346
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: Dave346; Army Air Corps; Diogenesis
"They went into the negotiations it seems to me with the attitude with the Russians just like the guy who goes into the car dealership and says, `I'm not leaving here until I buy a car."'

Why is it good for the USA to agree not to allow converting missile launchers to interceptors, and why did all those ex-Bush security characters say this is such a good deal?

144 posted on 12/23/2010 6:40:44 AM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Budget sins can be fixed. Amnesty is irreversible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson