Supremes facing eligibility challenge to Obama, again (It won't go away)

WND ^ | DECEMBER 19, 2010 | Bob Unruh

[RobinMasters]

It just doesn't appear to be going away.

The idea that Barack Obama's eligibility to occupy the Oval Office, and do chores such as appointing Supreme Court justices, needs to be explored and documented is headed back to the highest court in the land.

According to the Supreme Court's own website, there is scheduled to be a conference Jan. 7, 2011, on a case submitted by Orly Taitz.

This particular case has had a long proceeding; it began as a challenge to the legality of the military orders under Obama, whose eligibility to hold the office of president never has been documented to date. While that officer, Capt. Connie Rhodes, ultimately followed her orders, the attorney was fined $20,000 in the case, and it continued its path through the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals and now is pending in Washington.

[IM2MAD]

I wonder when his father got his citizenship? Can a FOIA determine that? Are his records sealed too?

[Postman]

Yep...but worth doing..might be fun to watch them all squirm their ways out of it after dumping Zero...

[Postman]

Perhaps Alito, et al feel that revenge is a dish best served cold (as in more than a year after the State of the Union)?

[Larousse2]

Have you seen this:

U.S. Supreme Court Issues Landmark Decision: Constitution is Void

The U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark decision that serves to allow judges to void the Constitution in their courtrooms. The decision was issued on January 18, 2011, and the Court did not even explain the decision (Docket No. 10-632, 10-633, and 10-690). One word decisions: DENIED