You manage to stay under the radar, I don’t know how. One of these days you’ll get banned. The sooner the better. Celebrating the GLBT agenda - which you clearly stated above is just fine for civilian life - is against the mission of Free Republic.
And what if one day Jim Robinson decides to zot Hare Krishna's, little jeremiah, which religion you promote on your FR homepage?
Note that I don't consider your religious beliefs to invalidate your conservatism, but many here would.
I assume that if a pack of zot hyenas gangs up on you, the way you've joined in ganging up in zot wars against others, you'll have no complaints, right?
Well, I kind of agree with him LJ, and I pinged Jim to the thread to provide him with the opportunity to ban me if he find my views on homosexuality incompatible with FR.
I have no issues with lesbians and homosexuals. They can’t reasonably serve in the military in the same units as straight servicemen, so I oppose that. It simply creates a hostile environment for the straight soldiers, so it’s unworkable. However, they should be forced to serve in homosexual only units should there be a draft. I’m offended by the notion that only straight young men should be forced to offer their lives in a war of such a scope that it would require the draft be reinstated.
In the civilian world, I believe they should be able to live their lives unmolested. The freedom of association that we possess (and the military lacks) is all that’s needed to protect those who don’t want to be around them.
If gay behavior offends you, it grosses me out (close enough to offense), don’t watch. Don’t go where they go, and truth to tell, there aren’t many of them, so they’re easy enough to avoid. They have their own bars, clubs, etc, so you almost have to seek them out to be offended.
I’m against the homosexual agenda, and by that I’m referring to situations like the photographer in New Mexico who was successfully sued because he wouldn’t take pictures of a purely ceremonial and non-binding gay wedding. That’s wrong, and it must be stopped. There were photographers who would have willing shot the wedding, and the couple should have chose one of those.
However, if you being against the homosexual agenda goes beyond that, then no LJ, I’m not on your side. I don’t want to punish anyone for being gay or make life rough on them. I just want to insure that they can’t compel those who’d rather not, take part. I want them to be free as a jaybird to be as gay as they want to be, while I remain free to be as far removed from that world as I choose.