Well, I kind of agree with him LJ, and I pinged Jim to the thread to provide him with the opportunity to ban me if he find my views on homosexuality incompatible with FR.
I have no issues with lesbians and homosexuals. They can’t reasonably serve in the military in the same units as straight servicemen, so I oppose that. It simply creates a hostile environment for the straight soldiers, so it’s unworkable. However, they should be forced to serve in homosexual only units should there be a draft. I’m offended by the notion that only straight young men should be forced to offer their lives in a war of such a scope that it would require the draft be reinstated.
In the civilian world, I believe they should be able to live their lives unmolested. The freedom of association that we possess (and the military lacks) is all that’s needed to protect those who don’t want to be around them.
If gay behavior offends you, it grosses me out (close enough to offense), don’t watch. Don’t go where they go, and truth to tell, there aren’t many of them, so they’re easy enough to avoid. They have their own bars, clubs, etc, so you almost have to seek them out to be offended.
I’m against the homosexual agenda, and by that I’m referring to situations like the photographer in New Mexico who was successfully sued because he wouldn’t take pictures of a purely ceremonial and non-binding gay wedding. That’s wrong, and it must be stopped. There were photographers who would have willing shot the wedding, and the couple should have chose one of those.
However, if you being against the homosexual agenda goes beyond that, then no LJ, I’m not on your side. I don’t want to punish anyone for being gay or make life rough on them. I just want to insure that they can’t compel those who’d rather not, take part. I want them to be free as a jaybird to be as gay as they want to be, while I remain free to be as far removed from that world as I choose.
You consistently and conveniently ignore the jackbooted thuggism of the homsoexual agenda. Our rights of freedom of religion, speech and association are already - right now - curtailed due to the homosexual agenda, and it’s only getting worse.
You pretend for some reason not to see this. You aren’t dumb, so it’s not that you can’t read well. There have been many, many hundreds of articles about the infringements on our rights from the advancement of the homosexual agenda for years and years. Have you somehow managed to avoid reading any of those aritcles? That’s hard to believe.
Well, that’s the entire point of this exercise. If you push the homosexual agenda (which I feel is a repugnant Marxist attack on our God-given constitutional rights) on FR, your account here will get the zot.
Pretty simple. Either you is or you ain’t, baby.
It is what I have been not able to communicate as my views as well.
Wonderful job.
We all have choices who we have in our lives.
Like smokers they are free to smoke but not in or on our property.
My son just cannot tolerate the smell and even chooses not to go often to the Indian Casinos as it makes him ill.
And likewise if my sons’ severe disability is offensive to any business we want to go to we simply don't if not welcomed.
Fortunately that has not happened to many times.
You need to preach it to the homosexuals and their lobby.
For it is they who are our schools, on our TVs, in our theaters, music, fashion, in our politics, in our healthcare, and in our churches, telling our children and young people that anal sex is natural and normal. And yet you derisively tell us to stay out of “gay” bars?
WE are surrounded by them daily, they have demands and punishments for us, legal and fiscal, among others. THEY are trying making “life rough” for us, not the other way around. And yet you imply that all we have to do is just “not watch them”? As if we do watch them?
Why chastise Freepers? We did not start this fire.
So it’s fine with you when they “adopt” twin toddler girls and take them out with dog collars on leashes at their “gay pride events”?