Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion
I can only shrug. We simply disagree.

Fox News? Some guy two years ago claimed they were being threatened, IIRC. Not a peep about that since. Maybe Fox News doesn't want to talk about this issue because they think it's misguided at best or nutty and detrimental at worst.

Judge Thomas? B, he was making a joke. There's a history of Thomas and that fellow jesting about the issue of whether or not a Peurto Rican would be an NBC. Instead of accepting that he was making a joke you chose to search for explanations that supported your presumptions. Explanations such as Soros blackmailing them USSC and the USSC kowtowing to him on the mater.

Unethical actions by eligibility judges? There haven't been. But you choose to believe that there have and to explain why nobody in the system calls them on it you seem to resort to expanding the conspiracy to include more and more folks.

If you are feeling torn, take some time away from this B. It's Christmas. Turn off the computer, set aside Obama and focus on the family.

And when, Lord willing, the Presidency moves out of Democrat hands, you'll see the pendulum swing Left and it will become more clear that dots can be connected by anyone who decides they really ought to be connected.

675 posted on 12/18/2010 12:59:21 PM PST by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 656 | View Replies ]


To: El Sordo

Or maybe they said they were threatened because they were, and any further action on it would result in payback. Doug Hagmann says he has the handwritten notes from the meeting where the media head told the on-air personalities about the threats. And the behaviors that surround just that time fit the allegations.

The difference between Thomas’ comment now and in previous instances is that there had never been any cases before. Now there ARE cases. And Thomas’ statements that Serrano would do better to try to be a SCOTUS justice than to be a POTUS because a SCOTUS justice doesn’t have to be born in the USA pretty much tells us that Thomas isn’t afraid to duck the presidential eligibility issue. But yet he says they are evading it.

If that was the only odd thing I’d write it off, as you say. But there ARE other odd things, not only with the SCOTUS justices but with the other judges (and I did mention some of the ethics breaches, such as David Carter hiring a clerk from Perkins-Coie in the middle of a suit which was originally argued by Perkins-Coie, the ex parte meeting with Obama initiated by Chief Justice Roberts on the same day that they refused the Donofrio case, the Robertson ex parte claim that the issue had been decided on Twitter, etc).

I don’t have time to go over this again. You’re acting like I never said any of the stuff I’ve already said.


688 posted on 12/18/2010 7:58:54 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 675 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson