I don’t doubt Churchill would recognize Obama for what he is. I do, however, doubt that he would engage in conspiracy theories.
I doubt that Churchill would be queasy at calling a conspiracy what it is. And what else would you call the illegal behavior of multiple government agencies, combined with the documented threats to media if they reported on this issue?
I haven’t yet posted all the documentation about it it yet, but there is solid evidence that microfilms were changed out at least once in every library that’s listed in a list of holdings for the Star-Bulletin and Honolulu Advertiser for the dates that Obama’ birth announcements were supposedly printed. Except one, and that’s only because we don’t know what it has because we didn’t check that library.
So not only is it a conspiracy, it is a quite extended and elaborate one, involving multiple government agencies and the alteration of historic documents in libraries in 2 states and the Library of Congress. (If nothing else it deserves RICO charges.)
And it is a documented conspiracy.
So I see no reason for Churchill or anybody else of sound mind to put their fingers in their ears and act as if it’s crazy to acknowledge that you’re at war when the actions of your enemies are already documented. It’s just as stupid to deny a documented conspiracy as it is to claim one that’s been disproven. And in this case, the multiple illegal activities to deceive the public have already been documented.
Neville Chamberlain insisted that Hitler wasn’t trying to take over the world; he was just feeling a little constrained by the borders of his country, wanted to do a little annexing. Hitler wasn’t conspiratorial, Chamberlain believed, and the way to deal with it was to just get along, not make any outlandish conspiracy claims, and just appease Hitler into tranquillity.
Churchill, OTOH, saw right through Hitler - and through the German propaganda ministry which strictly adhered to the policy that the people would believe a big lie before they would believe a little one.
“Big lie” is another definition for “conspiracy”. IOW, Hitler and his machine were engaged in a conspiracy and said the bigger it was, the more likely it was to succeed. Churchill recognized the character and plot of the conspirators, and simply believed what his eyes told him.
And I have no doubts he would see right through Obama AND the motivations behind the laws broken by multiple government agencies and the falsification of multiple historic records in multiple states - all on Obama’s behalf.